1966
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1966.21.6.1767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of aerobic work performed during recovery from exhausting work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

1971
1971
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, after that equilibrium has been attained, two possibilities are given: (i) these capacitances differ in size or in resistance, so that the process of lactate removal is characterized by different time constants, in which case two exponentials are necessary to characterize the function describing lactate removal from the body, or (ii) these two capacitances have the same size and resistance, so that the process of lactate removal from the two body fluids is characterized by equal time constants, in which case a mono-exponential fully describes the entire phenomenon. The body of evidence in favour of the latter hypothesis is important though ancient (Åstrand 1960;di Prampero et al 1978a, b;Gisolfi et al 1966;Hermansen and Stensvold 1972;Margaria et al 1933Margaria et al , 1963b.…”
Section: The Meaning Of Blood Lactate In Supramaximal Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, after that equilibrium has been attained, two possibilities are given: (i) these capacitances differ in size or in resistance, so that the process of lactate removal is characterized by different time constants, in which case two exponentials are necessary to characterize the function describing lactate removal from the body, or (ii) these two capacitances have the same size and resistance, so that the process of lactate removal from the two body fluids is characterized by equal time constants, in which case a mono-exponential fully describes the entire phenomenon. The body of evidence in favour of the latter hypothesis is important though ancient (Åstrand 1960;di Prampero et al 1978a, b;Gisolfi et al 1966;Hermansen and Stensvold 1972;Margaria et al 1933Margaria et al , 1963b.…”
Section: The Meaning Of Blood Lactate In Supramaximal Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies that were carried out with the aim of determining the effects of different types of recovery exercises after exhaustive effort on blood lactate removal [7,8,9,10], results show that active recovery carried out in low intensity is more effective when compared with exercise recovery carried out in moderate intensity or passively. In general, the procedures used during active recovery vary according to the intensity of the activity, the type of exercise and the time of activity [8,11,12].…”
Section: In Nt Tr Ro Od Du Uc Ct Ti Io On Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, more blood carrying lactate could reach the visceral region, considered an important site of lactate removal [10], as the venous return is facilitated in such conditions. Gisolfi et al [9] claim that the increase in the rate of lactate removal in recovery exercises is probably due to the following factors: 1) faster distribution of lactate to the liver for conversion into oxidation or glycogen, 2) increased use of the lactate by the heart muscle, and 3) possible increased oxidation of lactate used as fuel for muscle work. Therefore, the completion of 30 minutes of exercises after maximal effort contributes to the reduction of the oxygen debt.…”
Section: R Re Es Su Ul Lt Ts Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that the best recovery intensity would be at AT power output or even passive, since there is no lactate formation during light-intensity exercise. Two previous studies showed that the best lactate removal occurs for recovery intensities of 52% [41] and 63% of VO 2max [42]. When comparing active and passive recoveries, Abderrahmane et al [43] demonstrated that interval training in moderately trained individuals with active recovery increased VO 2max and maximal aerobic velocity.…”
Section: Recovery Phasementioning
confidence: 96%