Effectiveness of the Story-Mapping Strategy in Students with Disabilities: Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Experimental Design Studies

Training programme for community service providers who support adults with intellectual disabilities: A systematic quantitative literature review of single‐case research

“…First, overall research quality limits the results and interpretations. None of the studies were of high quality (21/21; Cure et al, 2021), only four studies met the criteria of acceptable quality (17/20; Cure et al, 2021), and none were conducted rigorously to have confidence in the causal effects (NSTTAC, 2010). Future research must improve the research quality on this topic.…”

“…Each indicator was assessed as either present or absent (i.e., 1 or 0) to provide a total quality rating out of 21, with higher scores indicating better quality. The studies were categorised as high quality if all the quality indicators were met (21/21), acceptable quality if between 17 and 20 of the items were present (i.e., 80%–89%), and poor quality for those articles with less than 17 quality indicator items present (i.e., < 80%; Cure et al, 2021).…”