2018
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness and safety of 0·5% colchicine cream vs. photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolaevulinate in the treatment of actinic keratosis and skin field cancerization of the forearms: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: COL 0·5% cream and MAL-PDT are safe and effective for treating SFC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Limited evidence is available on the efficacy of AK treatments for lesions located on the arms that fulfills the inclusion criteria for the present research. 5,[41][42][43][44][45][46] The majority of studies investigated PDT (with ALA or MAL), some of the treatments are off-label for the use on the arms.…”
Section: Question 3: In a Patient With Multiple Aks On The Arms Whmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited evidence is available on the efficacy of AK treatments for lesions located on the arms that fulfills the inclusion criteria for the present research. 5,[41][42][43][44][45][46] The majority of studies investigated PDT (with ALA or MAL), some of the treatments are off-label for the use on the arms.…”
Section: Question 3: In a Patient With Multiple Aks On The Arms Whmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The histological characterization of SFC should provide additional contributions to the AK count, quality of life scales, and clinical severity scores4, 35, 36 in understanding the underlying phenomena of SFC. These findings are being tested in clinical trials of SFC treatments such as photodynamic therapy, 37 ingenol mebutate, and 5-fluorouracil, and according to a scale of severity of AKs in development for the present authors’ SFC study group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These last two options demand supervision by an experienced statistics professional. [26][27][28][29] Measurement instruments comprising items with ordinal scores (for example, quality of life surveys) should be assessed for dimensionality and can be more adequately analyzed using models based on item response theory for ordinal data. 30,31 Finally, there is a certain degree of controversy with relation to exclusive use of ordinal statistical technique (non-parametric methods) for all cases, because of their lower statistical power compared to parametric techniques.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%