Background The management of paediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) is challenging, mostly relying on emollients and topical corticosteroids. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, has been recently approved for the treatment of children aged 6–11 years with moderate-to-severe AD not adequately controlled with topical therapies or when those therapies are not advisable. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate in real life the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of children aged from 6 to 11 years. Methods Demographic and clinical data of children aged 6–11 years, affected by moderate-to-severe AD and treated with dupilumab, were retrospectively collected from 24 dermatological and paediatric referral centres. Dupilumab was administered subcutaneously at an induction dose of 300 mg on day (D) 1, followed by 300 mg on D15 and 300 mg every 4 weeks. Disease severity was assessed at baseline and after week 2 (W2), W4 and W16 of dupilumab therapy using Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI), Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) and Sleep NRS (S-NRS) and Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (c-DLQI) score. Results A total of 55 AD children (24 males [43.64%], 31 females [56.36%]; mean age 9.35 ± 1.75 years) were included. A significant improvement in EASI score, P-NRS, S-NRS and c-DLQI was observed from baseline to W16 of treatment with dupilumab. In particular, at W16 the proportion of patients achieving EASI75 was 74.54%. Moreover, at the same timepoint a significant mean percentage reduction for P-NRS, S-NRS and c-DLQI was also observed (68.39%, 70.22% and 79.03%, respectively). Conclusions Our real-life data seem to confirm the effectiveness of dupilumab in paediatric patients on all disease aspects, including extent and severity of signs, intensity of symptoms, sleep and QoL, with a good safety profile.

Background Moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in the adolescence is a high burden disease, and its treatment can be very challenging due to paucity of approved systemic drugs for this age and their side‐effects. Dupilumab was recently approved for treatment of adolescent AD. Objectives A multicentre, prospective, real‐world study on the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adolescents (aged from ≥12 to <18 years) with moderate‐to‐severe AD was conducted. The main AD clinical phenotypes were also examined. Methods Data of adolescents with moderate‐to‐severe AD treated with dupilumab at label dosage for 16 weeks were collected. Treatment outcome was assessed by EASI, NRS itch, NRS sleep loss and CDLQI scores at baseline and after 16 weeks of treatment. The clinical scores were also evaluated according to clinical phenotypes. Results One hundred and thirty‐nine adolescents were enrolled in the study. Flexural eczema and head and neck eczema were the most frequent clinical phenotypes, followed by hand eczema and portrait‐like dermatitis. Coexistence of more than 1 phenotype was documented in 126/139 (88.5%) adolescents. Three patients (2.1%) contracted asymptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and 1 of the discontinued dupilumab treatment before the target treatment period. A significant improvement in EASI, NRS itch, NRS sleep loss and CDLQI was observed after 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab. This outcome was better than that observed in clinical trials. Dupilumab resulted effective in all AD phenotypes, especially in diffuse eczema. Twenty‐eight (20.1%) patients reported adverse events, conjunctivitis and flushing being the most frequent. None of patients discontinued dupilumab due to adverse event. Conclusions Dupilumab in adolescent AD showed excellent effectiveness at week 16 with consistent improvement of all clinical scores. Moreover, dupilumab showed a good safety profile also in this COVID‐19 pandemic era.

and busyness level (P = 0.03), and positively associated with stress (P < 0.001) and air pressure (P = 0.05). In addition, POEM was significantly higher in weeks with high Birch (P = 0.018) and Elm pollen (P = 0.008). Daily temperature tended to associate negatively with POEM while daily active time and diurnal temperature range showed no association with POEM. POEM was higher in weeks with shorter sleep duration, however, not significant (P = 0.061). Occasionally, the associations between triggers and POEM indicated opposite responses in the study population (Fig. 2). iSCORAD was positively associated with the self-reported stress levels (P = 0.002) but not with any of the other passive data. iSCORAD was, however, strongly associated with POEM in a linear mixed effect model (P < 0.001). Our findings are in line with previous studies reporting that low humidity decreases skin barrier function and, for most subjects, increases AD symptoms 4 that discrepancies exist with regards to temperature, which may be both protective 3,4 and harmful, 7 and that AD symptoms can be triggered by a variety of pollens. 8,9 Furthermore, stress is a well-known trigger factor which this study also supports. 10 Overall, our data indicate that within AD, the importance of specific trigger factors varies from patient to patient. In conclusion, data collected passively through the smartphone (mainly GPS) is associated with patients' subjective disease severity (POEM). This was shown for air humidity and -pressure, pollen and overall busyness level supporting that lifestyle and environmental factors are linked to AD disease activity.

Two round tables involving experts were organized in order to reach a consensus on the management of patients with actinic keratosis (AK). In the first, seven clinical questions were selected and analyzed by a systematic literature review, using a Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes framework; in the second, the experts discussed relevant evidences and a consensus statement for each question was developed. Consensus was reached among experts on how to best treat AK patients with respect to different clinical scenarios and special populations. Lesion-directed treatments are preferred in patients with few AKs. Patients with multiple AKs are challenging, with more than one treatment usually needed to achieve complete lesion clearance or a high lesion response rate, therapy should be personalized, based on previous treatments, patient, and lesion characteristics. Methyl aminolevulinate-PDT, DL (day light) PDT, and imiquimod cream were demonstrated to have the lowest percentage of new AKs after post treatment follow-up. For IMQ 5% and 3.75%, a higher intensity of skin reactions is associated with higher efficacy. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is the most studied treatment for AKs on the arms. Regular sunscreen use helps preventing new AKs. Oral nicotinamide 500 mg twice daily, systemic retinoids and regular sunscreen use were demonstrated to reduce the number of new squamous cell carcinomas in patients with AKs. Limited evidence is available for the treatment of AKs in organ transplant recipients. There is no evidence in favor or against the use of any of the available treatments in patients suffering from hematological cancer. K E Y W O R D S 0.5% 5-FU (fluoro uracil)-salicylic acid, actinic keratosis, ALA and MAL PDT, cancerization field, imiquimod cream (3.75% and 5%), ingenol mebutate gel, nicotinamide, organ transplant recipients, systemic retinoids, topical treatment

Poikiloderma with neutropenia (PN) is a very rare genetic disorder mainly characterized by poikiloderma and congenital neutropenia, which explains the recurrence of respiratory infections and risk of developing bronchiectasis. Patients are also prone to develop hematological and skin cancers. Here, we present the case of a patient, the only child of apparently unrelated Serbian parents, affected by PN resulting from the homozygous mutation NM_024598.3:c.243G&gt;A (p.Trp81Ter) of USB1; early onset of poikiloderma (1 year of age) was associated with cutaneous mastocytosis. We also provide a review of the literature on this uncommon condition with a focus on dermatological findings.