2001
DOI: 10.13182/fst01-a11963305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Thermal Conductivity Measurement of the Candidate Ceramic Breeder Pebble Beds by the Hot Wire Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, under the very low gas pressure («1 atm), the effect of gas pressure is especially obvious, while in a pressure range of 1-100 atm the effect of gas pressure is pretty negligible and can be ignored (the possible pebble deformation and even crush caused by high gas pressure are not considered here). This phenomenon is consistent with the observation by Earnshaw et al [14] and Enoeda et al [9].…”
Section: Effect On Conductionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, under the very low gas pressure («1 atm), the effect of gas pressure is especially obvious, while in a pressure range of 1-100 atm the effect of gas pressure is pretty negligible and can be ignored (the possible pebble deformation and even crush caused by high gas pressure are not considered here). This phenomenon is consistent with the observation by Earnshaw et al [14] and Enoeda et al [9].…”
Section: Effect On Conductionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Although many studies, such as calculation modeling [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] and experimental measurements [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] on the effective thermal conductivity of pebble beds have been performed, effects and comprehensive analysis of many other influencing factors on k eff are still not carried out. Considering that experimental studies on so many influencing factors will spend much money and time, the preliminary study using a calculation model appear more necessary and important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was experimentally measured in previous studies [16,17] for a temperature range of 425-775 • C. The measured values of k eff in these studies are not included in the comparison, shown in Fig. 5, because their temperature range is beyond the temperature range of this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since last two decades; worldwide efforts have been dedicated to its R&D [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The other probable solid breeders are lithium oxide (Li 2 O), lithium orthosilicate (Li 4 SiO 4 ), and lithium-metazirconate (Li 2 ZrO 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conducted experiments over a temperature range of 100-1175 • C. In 1998, Earnshaw et al [8] measured k eff of 1.2 mm Li 2 ZrO 3 pebble bed, under helium over a temperature range of 75-1170 • C. In 2000, Donne et al [9] also measured k eff of Li 4 SiO 4 pebble bed. In 2001, Enoeda et al [10] measured k eff of Li 2 TiO 3 , Li 4 SiO 4 , Li 2 ZrO 3 , and Li 2 O pebble beds under helium atmosphere and presented correlations based on experimental results. Hatano et al [11] determined k eff of Li 2 TiO 3 pebble bed at vacuum to 0.2 MPa helium atmosphere and temperature range from 420 to 775 • C. In 2002, Hoshino et al [12] reported their study on effective thermal conductivity of single and binary pebble bed of Li 2 TiO 3 pebbles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%