2017
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002095
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Repair of Dural Tear Using Bioabsorbable Sheet With Fibrin Glue

Abstract: 4.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2c). One can also use fibrin glue to prevent leakage from the pinhole [42]. Filling the cranial cavity with warm water is necessary to evacuate the air before complete closure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2c). One can also use fibrin glue to prevent leakage from the pinhole [42]. Filling the cranial cavity with warm water is necessary to evacuate the air before complete closure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They contain human plasma protein and thus are immunocompatible and provide the best results. [ 5 6 7 8 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 4 5 6 ] Of this, the use of fibrin sealants is the latest and such sealants are used for tissue sealing across a range of surgical procedures, including cardiothoracic, gastrointestinal, neurosurgery, and vascular surgeries. [ 7 8 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the dura is a non-regenerative tissue [ 8 ], repair techniques or materials that can quickly seal leaks and promote the formation of surrounding fibrous connective tissue to close the dural defect are urgently needed. So far, many techniques and materials have been reported to repair spinal dural defect, including simple sutures, sealants, bioabsorbable staples, and various types of grafts and patches [ [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] ]. Among these repair methods, sutures will lead to needle holes leakage, and sealants can not meet the demand of dural defect repair because of its poor sealing effect in large spinal dural defect [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%