2016
DOI: 10.1108/jedt-03-2014-0017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective practices for the concept design of electromechanical systems

Abstract: General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms There are a number of well-known tools and methods acknowledged as useful in facilitating concept designing, that is, to assist idea generation, aid evaluation and final selection of one winning concept from many. Combinations of these popular concept design tools and methods provide … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, it is acknowledged that methods from academia are not widely diffused in the industry (Araujo and Benedetto-Neto, 1996;Birkhofer and Kloberdanz, 2005;Eder, 1998;Frost, 1999;Geis et al, 2008;Jagtap et al, 2014;Maurer and Widmann, 2012), but the reasons about this lack have not been comprehensively identified. Moreover, no standard or universally adopted conceptual design methods exist in practice (Booker, 2016). Therefore, it is difficult to convince students that methods can be useful, also because some past successful products have been developed without them (Geis et al, 2008).…”
Section: Current Issues In Teaching Systematic Conceptual Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, it is acknowledged that methods from academia are not widely diffused in the industry (Araujo and Benedetto-Neto, 1996;Birkhofer and Kloberdanz, 2005;Eder, 1998;Frost, 1999;Geis et al, 2008;Jagtap et al, 2014;Maurer and Widmann, 2012), but the reasons about this lack have not been comprehensively identified. Moreover, no standard or universally adopted conceptual design methods exist in practice (Booker, 2016). Therefore, it is difficult to convince students that methods can be useful, also because some past successful products have been developed without them (Geis et al, 2008).…”
Section: Current Issues In Teaching Systematic Conceptual Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined factors, the servo motor and the stepper motor can be selected to the designed leveling system in this paper. Comparing the performance of the two motors, the control accuracy of servo motors is mainly determined directly by the pulses emitted by the encoder, which is more accurate, faster and has a shorter response time than stepper motors (Booker et al , 2016). Stepper motors are prone to low-frequency vibration at low speeds; the output torque decreases as the speed increases, and they do not have overload capability.…”
Section: Design and Selection Of Key Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows a Pareto Chart combining the important figures of merit from six case studies in electro-mechanical system design [38], with the prominence of reliability (combined with safety) and efficiency indicated. Robustness and specific geometric/performance figures of merit are difficult to quantify at system conceptualization stages, and do The current industry standard is based around three phase electrical drive technologies.…”
Section: Figures Of Meritmentioning
confidence: 99%