2018
DOI: 10.1108/jedt-02-2018-0017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstraction framework to support students in learning creative conceptual design

Abstract: Purpose Learning systematic conceptual design approaches could be difficult for students who are asked to adapt their intuitive design rationale to more abstract and divergent thinking styles. The purpose of this study is to propose a conceptual design approach with a well-defined reference framework and procedure to help students to gradually move toward concreteness and to explore the design space. Design/methodology/approach The so-called problem–solution network approach has been taken as a reference and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the creative process, designers usually recur to several sources of inspiration to seek analogies from different domains and with the aim of obtaining inspiration. In this sense, two relevant aspects widely studied in this field are "fixation" and "inspiration", showing some studies how the use of examples facilitates the generation of novel and high-quality ideas [56][57][58][59].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the creative process, designers usually recur to several sources of inspiration to seek analogies from different domains and with the aim of obtaining inspiration. In this sense, two relevant aspects widely studied in this field are "fixation" and "inspiration", showing some studies how the use of examples facilitates the generation of novel and high-quality ideas [56][57][58][59].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main phases of the systematic design process followed in this work can be schematically represented by Figure 7, where it is possible to observe that the conceptual design process can be furtherly split in three sub-phases (Fiorineschi, 2018;Fiorineschi et al, 2016). It is worth to notice that even if not represented in Figure 7, the overall design process is highly iterative, and then several iterations are expected among the different design phases (Pahl et al, 2007).…”
Section: Systematic Design Of a New Gearboxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a new conceptual design approach has been proposed in literature, which is claimed to overcome the limits of Functional Decomposition and Morphology, by exploiting the systematic tracking of problems and solutions co-evolutions of the concept alternatives generated during the design process (Fiorineschi et al, 2016). The approach is based on six fundamental rules, which allow the generation of a structured network of problems and solutions, which can be conveniently used for managing the design space exploration and to overcome design fixation, especially if predefined abstraction frameworks are adopted (Fiorineschi, 2018). It is constituted by three main phases that substantially provide a further nested subdivision of the overall systematic design process (Figure 7).…”
Section: Systematic Conceptual Design: the Problem-solution-network Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restricted by the complexity and uncertainty of reasoning processes and the incompleteness of reasoning knowledge [17][18][19][20], the AI-based FBS model for function reasoning mainly deals with the conceptual design of mechanical systems in series combinations [21][22][23][24] but fails to support non-routine design problems [13,25]. To overcome the flaws ascribed to classical function-based methods and increase the FBS model's capability to generate creative design schemes, the integrated framework [26,27] to manage abstraction levels…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%