2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of viscosity enhancing agents on quasi-static compression behavior of aluminum foams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 15,16,31,33–37 ] In terms of the strength to weight ratio, the EG composites do not fare as well as vinyl ester syntactic foams, [ 31 ] but outperform them in stiffness to weight ratio. The EG developed in this study perform better than the Al matrix syntactic foams [ 38,39 ] in terms of strength to weight ratio. Vinyl ester is cheaper than aluminum and the expanded glass filler is also inexpensive, making this foam a viable substitute for aluminum foams.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 15,16,31,33–37 ] In terms of the strength to weight ratio, the EG composites do not fare as well as vinyl ester syntactic foams, [ 31 ] but outperform them in stiffness to weight ratio. The EG developed in this study perform better than the Al matrix syntactic foams [ 38,39 ] in terms of strength to weight ratio. Vinyl ester is cheaper than aluminum and the expanded glass filler is also inexpensive, making this foam a viable substitute for aluminum foams.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These values are extracted from published literature on compressive properties of foams. Compressive strength comparisons are shown in Figure 7A [ 15,16,31,33–39 ] and compressive modulus in Figure 7B. [ 15,16,31,33–37 ] In terms of the strength to weight ratio, the EG composites do not fare as well as vinyl ester syntactic foams, [ 31 ] but outperform them in stiffness to weight ratio.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, TiH 2 forms Al 3 Ti, which is a brittle compound, and due to this, the energy absorption capability is lower than that of the foams produced by CaCO 3 . By differential thermal analysis (DTA) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of CaCO 3 powder, it can be confirmed that its decomposition begins at a temperature of 650 • C and ends at around 900 • C [28]. As a result of that, foaming of CaCO 3 foams needs to be performed at slightly higher temperatures compared to TiH 2 foams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing research focuses on developing porous materials speci cally designed for impact energy absorption applications. These materials, reinforced with ceramic particles, aim to enhance foam stability and undergo testing under various strain rate (SR) regimes to assess their performance under compressive loadings [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%