Effect of Tooth Brushing on the Surface of Enamel and Direct and Indirect CAD/CAM Restorative Materials

Nima, Gabriel; Lugo-Varillas, Jocelyn Graciela; Soto, Jorge; Faraoni, Juliana Jendiroba; Palma‐Dibb, Regina Guenka; Correa-Medina, Albert; Giannini, Marcelo

doi:10.11607/ijp.6594

Cited by 10 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The Cohen's Kappa agreement test showed an index of 0.91 for full-text for the articles selected. Six articles were selected according to the inclusion criteria [20][21][22][23][24][25]. No clinical studies were included.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…No details on measurements with the profilometer were reported in the article of Morman et al [20] and Koizumi et al [21]. Nima et al [25] used a 3D noncontact laser-scanning microscope to obtain the measurements and 3D images of the sample. All authors used the mean surface roughness (Ra) value in µm to compare the value before and after toothbrushing [20][21][22][23][24] except Nima et al [25], who used the maximum relative depth (Rv).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nima et al [25] used a 3D noncontact laser-scanning microscope to obtain the measurements and 3D images of the sample. All authors used the mean surface roughness (Ra) value in µm to compare the value before and after toothbrushing [20][21][22][23][24] except Nima et al [25], who used the maximum relative depth (Rv). For Rv calculation, five measurements were made that started in the control area and extended into the brushed region.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Different toothpastes were used in the experiments. RDA index values were 70 for the toothpaste used by Flury et al [22], 136 in the research of Koizumi et al [21], 80 for Kamonkhantiku et al [23], 70/80 for Schmitt de Andrade et al [24], 44 for Nima et al [25], and not identified in the article of Morman et al [20]. Five of six selected articles identified an increase of surface roughness on resin-contained CAD/CAM materials after toothbrushing [21][22][23][24][25].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Effect of Toothpaste on the Surface Roughness of the Resin-Contained CAD/CAM Dental Materials: A Systematic Review

Fiore

Stellini

Basilicata

et al. 2022

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The purpose of this review is to describe the possible effect of toothbrushing on surface roughness of resin-contained CAD/CAM materials. Methods: Systematic literature search for articles published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2000 and February 2020 has been conducted, which evaluated the effect of brushing on surface roughness of resin-contained CAD/CAM dental materials. The research was conducted in Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Science Direct using a combination of the following MeSH/Emtree terms: “brushing”, “resin-based”, “dental”, “CAD/CAM”, and “surface roughness”. Results: A total of 249 articles were found in the search during initial screening. Fifty-five articles were selected for the full-text evaluation after the steps of reading of abstract/title and remotion of duplicate. Only six articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The Cohen’s Kappa agreement test showed an index of 0.91 for full-text. Discussion: Four of five selected articles identified an increase of surface roughness on resin-contained CAD/CAM materials after toothbrushing. Although all the articles examined used different toothpastes with no homogeneous relative dentine abrasivity (RDA) and cycles of brushing, the findings are about the same. The possible reason is attributable to the compositions of the resin-contained CAD/CAM materials. Conclusions: The surface roughness of most resin-contained CAD/CAM materials was affected by artificial toothbrushing. Correct knowledge of the composition of the dental material and toothpastes is fundamental to avoid an increase of surface roughness on prosthetic rehabilitation.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effect of Toothpaste on the Surface Roughness of the Resin-Contained CAD/CAM Dental Materials: A Systematic Review

Fiore

Stellini

Basilicata

et al. 2022

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In Laborstudien konnte gezeigt werden, dass Hybridkeramiken nach gehäuftem Zähneputzen eine bessere Abrasionsfestigkeit und Oberflächenbeständigkeit hinsichtlich Glanz und Rauheit aufweisen als die CAD/CAM-Komposite [8]. Die Oberflächenrauheit nach Beanspruchung durch ausgeprägtes Reinigen mit Zahnbürsten war jedoch etwas stärker als bei den klassischen Silikatkeramiken [9]. Auch erosive Faktoren, die durch Sodbrennen oder saure Getränke ausgelöst werden können, beeinflussen die Rauheit der hybridkeramischen Restaurationsoberflächen.…”

Section: Oberflächenbeständigkeit Der Hybridkeramikunclassified

Hybridkeramik für die Single-Visit-Restauration

Butz¹,

Hahnel²,

Rauch³

2021

ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Correlation of Surface Roughness Parameters of Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate with Steatite Wear

Krüger

Wille

Kern

2022

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Various surface roughness parameters are utilized to describe the surface in the tooth to ceramics abrasion and to assess the resulting wear. The use of threedimensional parameters may offer a better estimation for wear and an improved deduced clinical surface treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of various surface roughness parameters of zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics on the wear of steatite antagonists. Material and methods: Forty zirconia specimens with a diameter of 7 mm and a thickness of 3 mm and 40 lithium disilicate specimens with the dimensions 10×10×4 mm were each divided into five subgroups. Two subgroups were treated with different clinically established diamond burs; a third subgroup was treated with a silicone polishing set. Two additional subgroups were produced by glazing the surfaces after treatment. Surface roughness parameters were determined by laser scanning microscopy. All specimens underwent 1.2 million loading cycles using steatite antagonists. After regular intervals of cycles, precision impressions were made to assess the wear. The correlation between wear and different roughness parameters was evaluated using the Spearman correlation test. Results: For the glazed zirconia, unglazed zirconia, and glazed lithium disilicate specimens no significant correlations (p > 0.05) between the investigated roughness parameters and antagonist wear could be found. In the unglazed lithium disilicate groups, significant (p ≤ 0.05) correlations with steatite substance loss could be found for several roughness parameters after 1.2 million cycles. Conclusions: For lithium disilicate, it seems not sufficient to use only one roughness parameter to indicate the wear behavior of the surface. There was no correlation between wear and the tested roughness parameters of zirconia surfaces. K E Y W O R D SZirconia, lithium disilicate, surface roughness parameter, wearIn the last decades all-ceramic single crowns (SCs) and all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) have gained widespread use, because of their high aesthetic and improved mechanical properties. 1 High-strength ceramics, combined with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) milling methods allow all-ceramic multi-span restorations, even in posterior areas, and alsoThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

show abstract

Effect of Tooth Brushing on the Surface of Enamel and Direct and Indirect CAD/CAM Restorative Materials

Cited by 10 publications

References 13 publications

Effect of Toothpaste on the Surface Roughness of the Resin-Contained CAD/CAM Dental Materials: A Systematic Review

Effect of Toothpaste on the Surface Roughness of the Resin-Contained CAD/CAM Dental Materials: A Systematic Review

Hybridkeramik für die Single-Visit-Restauration

The Correlation of Surface Roughness Parameters of Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate with Steatite Wear

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About