2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of theta burst stimulation over the human sensorimotor cortex on motor and somatosensory evoked potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
107
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
11
107
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The current flow of the initial rising phase of the biphasic pulse in the TMS coil induced a current flowing from posterior to anterior in the brain. On the basis of the decreased amplitude of the somatosensory-evoked potentials after cTBS over a region situated at 2 cm posterior to M1 (Ishikawa et al, 2007), we assumed that cTBS over S1 EYE results in a decreased excitability of this area. The control site of stimulation in the parietal lobe, P3, was located by using the International 10-20 system for EEG placement.…”
Section: Tmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current flow of the initial rising phase of the biphasic pulse in the TMS coil induced a current flowing from posterior to anterior in the brain. On the basis of the decreased amplitude of the somatosensory-evoked potentials after cTBS over a region situated at 2 cm posterior to M1 (Ishikawa et al, 2007), we assumed that cTBS over S1 EYE results in a decreased excitability of this area. The control site of stimulation in the parietal lobe, P3, was located by using the International 10-20 system for EEG placement.…”
Section: Tmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…80% of active motor threshold) in a short time, and it can evoke either facilitating or inhibiting effects according to the stimulation mode (intermittent [iTBS] or continuous [cTBS], respectively). In a recent paper, Ishikawa et al (2006) found that cTBS over sensory cortex reduced the amplitude of median nerve SEPs, particularly the P25 and later components, whereas cTBS over M1 had the opposite effect. The present short report complements that previous work by examining the effect of iTBS on SEPs to median nerve stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Repetitive delivery of TMS pulses (rTMS) to a brain region modulates the excitability of the stimulated area, inducing changes in neural plasticity (Allen, Pasley, Duong, & Freeman, 2007). These neuroplastic changes outlast the duration of stimulation and are believed to be induced through long‐term potentiation/depression mechanisms (Esser et al, 2006; Ishikawa et al, 2007). High (>5 Hz) or low (<5 Hz) frequency stimulation results in a lasting increase or decrease in excitability, respectively (Esser et al, 2006; Valero‐Cabré, Payne, & Pascual‐Leone, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%