2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of testing procedures on buildability properties of 3D-printable concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent review article, Mechtcherine et al [14] summarized the progress made in this regard. Some noteworthy mentions are: the methods developed based on Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion, parameterizing the cohesion and angle of internal friction of the material [58][59][60][61][62], and numerical models considering both the plastic yielding and elastic buckling criteria [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]. Another possible approach for predicting the failure and deformation during the printing process of cementitious materials is by using three-dimensional rheological models that can accurately describe its mechanical behaviour before and after yielding.…”
Section: Materials Behaviour At Early Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent review article, Mechtcherine et al [14] summarized the progress made in this regard. Some noteworthy mentions are: the methods developed based on Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion, parameterizing the cohesion and angle of internal friction of the material [58][59][60][61][62], and numerical models considering both the plastic yielding and elastic buckling criteria [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]. Another possible approach for predicting the failure and deformation during the printing process of cementitious materials is by using three-dimensional rheological models that can accurately describe its mechanical behaviour before and after yielding.…”
Section: Materials Behaviour At Early Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above analysis, weights of 150 g ± 10 g were used in the study: The study determined the relationship between axial normal stress and axial normal strain ( − ) of materials measured in a squeezing test after 15, 30 and 45 min of adding the water ( -printing time). The test was performed on a low-force compression device that allows for applying the force in the range of 5-200 N. The measurement error of the setup is ± 0.5 N. Consecutive loads were added at the appropriate time interval as presented in [17,34]. Three time intervals (cycle time) of 10 s, 15 s and 20 s were assumed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A model based on the Coulomb-Mohr theory for cement materials was used in the studies [31][32][33]. Casagrande et al [34] based on other studies [23,28,30] analyzed the way the printed structure failed due to loss of stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Certain, similar to ones used in soil mechanics test have also been applied, including uniaxial unconfined compression test [34] and direct shear test. A research [35] incorporated a cylindrical specimen with 60 mm diameter and 120 mm height for the purpose of the study. Numerical models for predicting variation in the stress and strain values of the individual layers of a structure as a whole, over time, are also being developed [32,[34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%