2018
DOI: 10.1002/aic.16197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of substrate curvature on microstructure and gas permeability of hollow fiber MFI zeolite membranes

Abstract: Literature data show that gas permeability of MFI zeolite membrane varies depending on the geometry of supports. The present work investigates the effects of the surface curvature of substrates on the microstructure and the gas permeation property of supported zeolite membranes. MFI zeolite membranes were grown on porous alumina hollow fibers with different diameters (surface curvature) by the secondary growth method. Single gas permeation and H 2 /CO 2 binary gas separation from 25 to 300 C were conducted to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S3, Generally, the thickness of zeolite membranes plays a role in the trade-off between gas permeability and selectivity. Whilst a thin membrane can increase the gas permeability this often leads to a reduction in the selectivity since the formation of defects and cracks is very likely during the synthesis of thin zeolite membranes on the surface of a support, especially cylindrical ones [43,57,58]. The synthesis time is a key factor for SAPO-34 crystallisation, and hence the membrane thickness.…”
Section: As Prepared Sapo-34 Membranes: Characterisation and Performance In Co 2 /Ch 4 Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S3, Generally, the thickness of zeolite membranes plays a role in the trade-off between gas permeability and selectivity. Whilst a thin membrane can increase the gas permeability this often leads to a reduction in the selectivity since the formation of defects and cracks is very likely during the synthesis of thin zeolite membranes on the surface of a support, especially cylindrical ones [43,57,58]. The synthesis time is a key factor for SAPO-34 crystallisation, and hence the membrane thickness.…”
Section: As Prepared Sapo-34 Membranes: Characterisation and Performance In Co 2 /Ch 4 Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14b, 15b] In unary permeation, the membrane (particularly after tertiary treatment) shows very high n-butane selectivity and permeance.T his clearly indicates the excellent microstructural quality of the membrane. An exact comparison of separation factors between two selective membrane types may have only limited value,b ut possible reasons for the difference include the hydrothermal growth mechanisms (for example,delivery of silica reactants from support versus from liquid phase as well as the SDAs), different microstructures after calcination of curved (fiber) versus flat (disk) membranes, [16] and different measurement times. Theresults of the present work with previous reports of MFI membranes (made by conventional polycrystalline film growth as well as with 2D MFI nanosheets) and other membrane types (polymeric,m ixed matrix, ZIF) are compared in the Supporting Information, Table S2.…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…75 after 60 h). An exact comparison of separation factors between two selective membrane types may have only limited value,b ut possible reasons for the difference include the hydrothermal growth mechanisms (for example,delivery of silica reactants from support versus from liquid phase as well as the SDAs), different microstructures after calcination of curved (fiber) versus flat (disk) membranes, [16] and different measurement times. [15] Finally,w e extend our investigation to the removal of natural gas liquid (NGL) components such as n-butane and propane from methane,currently carried out by cryogenic distillation.…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…75 after 60 h). An exact comparison of separation factors between two selective membrane types may have only limited value, but possible reasons for the difference include the hydrothermal growth mechanisms (for example, delivery of silica reactants from support versus from liquid phase as well as the SDAs), different microstructures after calcination of curved (fiber) versus flat (disk) membranes, and different measurement times . Finally, we extend our investigation to the removal of natural gas liquid (NGL) components such as n ‐butane and propane from methane, currently carried out by cryogenic distillation .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%