2011
DOI: 10.3923/javaa.2011.246.250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Stocking Density on Chick Performance, Internal Organ Weights and Blood Parameters in Broilers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
19
3
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
19
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was not statistically different among groups. Previous studies reported the same findings ( (Sekeroglu et al, 2011;Turkyilmaz, 2008;Ravindran et al, 2006;Buijs et al, 2009;Skomorucha et al, 2009;El-Gogary and Azzam, 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was not statistically different among groups. Previous studies reported the same findings ( (Sekeroglu et al, 2011;Turkyilmaz, 2008;Ravindran et al, 2006;Buijs et al, 2009;Skomorucha et al, 2009;El-Gogary and Azzam, 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The weights of the liver, gizzard and pancreas remained unaltered by the dietary inclusion of L-Thr or stocking density. Similarly, other reported that there were no significant difference in liver and gizzard weight (p>0.05) due to stocking density (El-Deek and Al-Harthi, 2004;Sekeroglu et al, 2011;EL-Gogary and Azzam, 2014). No interaction was noted between L-Thr supplementation and stocking density in organ weight.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This finding was similar to Estevez (2007) who reported that there was a negative consequence of high stocking on FCR. Contrary to this result Sekeroglu et al (2011) reported that there was no effect of stocking density on FCR. The average dressing percentage was significantly higher in G 2 and G 3 as compared to G 1 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…This result corroborates with the finding of Abanakgosi et al (2014) who reported that lower stocking density resulted in higher dressing percentage. Contrary to this Sekeroglu et al (2011) showed no significant effect of different stocking density on dressing percentage. In the present study there were no significant effect (P>0.05) of stocking density in the most of the carcass parts (Table 2) except the heart weight.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…Sekeroglu et al (2011) reported that broiler reared for six weeks had fi nal body weight of 2,256 g/bird at stocking density of 17 birds/m 2 compared to that of 2,420 g/bird at stocking density of 9 birds/m 2 . Body weight gain has strong correlation with fi nal body weight.…”
Section: Body Weight Gain and Final Body Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%