2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-014-1060-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Second Phase on the Deformation and Fracture Behavior of Multiphase Low-Density Steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8a) in comparison to 600 °C\10 -3 s -1 . However, the microstructures of both conditions are characterized with formation of longitudinal micro-cracks along the ferrite phase boundaries due to dissimilar plastic behavior of phases at ferrite\austenite interfaces [42][43][44][45]. Fig.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8a) in comparison to 600 °C\10 -3 s -1 . However, the microstructures of both conditions are characterized with formation of longitudinal micro-cracks along the ferrite phase boundaries due to dissimilar plastic behavior of phases at ferrite\austenite interfaces [42][43][44][45]. Fig.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in micro‐holes decreased the cross‐sectional area of the matrix between adjacent pores, dividing the matrix into a plurality of small units, each of which could be viewed as an independent, small tensile specimen. Under stress, internal necking occurred and caused the micro‐holes to connect with each other to form cracks . A three‐dimensional zone of tensile stress and a concentrated zone of plastic deformation were observed at the tip of the crack, and new micro‐holes formed in the region.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, the current study demonstrates that CBE opens up alternative routes to achieve unique microstructures other than via conventional GBE approaches, leading to ductile and strong steels without high carbon content and expensive doping elements. The S4) (13,(23)(24)(25). To allow a fair comparison, all data are from tensile tests with a gauge geometry obeying the ASTM E8/E8M standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%