2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot deformation characterization of duplex low-density steel through 3D processing map development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13a and b. As anticipated, the power efficiency not only changes with deformation temperature and strain rate but it varies with strain (Mohamadizadeh et al, 2015). During the first hit, the peak value of power dissipation rate is about 27% emerging at 1150 • C \0.01 s −1 and the strain of 0.3 (Fig.…”
Section: Development Of Processing Mapssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13a and b. As anticipated, the power efficiency not only changes with deformation temperature and strain rate but it varies with strain (Mohamadizadeh et al, 2015). During the first hit, the peak value of power dissipation rate is about 27% emerging at 1150 • C \0.01 s −1 and the strain of 0.3 (Fig.…”
Section: Development Of Processing Mapssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Taking account of an effective strain, consisting of the residual strain from the first hit and the strain imposed in the second hit, the partially recrystallized structure has more stored energy to make the DRX more easily take place compared with that of the first hit. It also can be found that the instability regions of every hit enlarge with the strain, in consistent with the fact that any deformation mechanism and flow instabilities may require a critical amount of strain to become effective (Mohamadizadeh et al, 2015).…”
Section: Development Of Processing Mapssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…At the temperature of 1150 • C, the recrystallization was completed. With increasing strain rate, the grain size gradually became smaller, because the recrystallized grains had less time to grow, which was also found in the literature [19][20][21]. The results in Figures 5 and 6 could explain the different flow behaviors of 300M steel at 0.01 s −1 and 10 s −1 in Figure 2.…”
Section: Microstructure Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Processing map on a wrought 2205 duplex stainless steel under hot compression conditions was developed based on the dynamic material model theories in a range of 1223–1473 K and 0.01–10 s −1 . Considering the effect of strain, 3D processing maps of duplex low‐density steel were developed for determining the safe and unsafe deformation conditions in association with the microstructural evolution …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%