The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/whc.2019.8816175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Remote Masking on Detection of Electrovibration

Abstract: Masking has been used to study human perception of tactile stimuli, including those created on haptic touch screens. Earlier studies have investigated the effect of in-site masking on tactile perception of electrovibration. In this study, we investigated whether it is possible to change the detection threshold of electrovibration at fingertip of index finger via remote masking, i.e. by applying a (mechanical) vibrotactile stimulus on the proximal phalanx of the same finger. The masking stimuli were generated b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behaviour is similar to the masking results reported in vibrotactile literature, which suggests a similar neural mechanism in detection and masking of electrovibration and vibrotactile stimuli. We refer readers to our earlier publication [25] for detailed comparison of our results with earlier studies and the possible reasons for the differences between the results.…”
Section: Mechanical Vs Neural Effects Of Maskingmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This behaviour is similar to the masking results reported in vibrotactile literature, which suggests a similar neural mechanism in detection and masking of electrovibration and vibrotactile stimuli. We refer readers to our earlier publication [25] for detailed comparison of our results with earlier studies and the possible reasons for the differences between the results.…”
Section: Mechanical Vs Neural Effects Of Maskingmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In this study, we build up on our earlier work [25] where the effect of directly applied mechanical vibrations on electrovibration absolute detection threshold was studied. We extended our research through studying the effect of similar mechanical vibration on electrovibration intensity difference threshold and explained the outcomes of experimental results using a model based on signal energies of hypothetical neural activations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is unexpected because when humans interact with surfaces with their fingertips, they do not feel only contact vibrations but also other properties, such as friction, thermal conductance, and stiffness, which the participants were deprived of in contactless conditions. Moreover, there is evidence in the literature [29], [30] that remote vibrotactile stimulus can alter the perception of another at the fingertip. However, we did not observe those in our experiments.…”
Section: A Comparison Of Virtual Textures To Their Real Counterpartsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is unexpected because when humans interact with surfaces with their fingertips, they do not feel only contact vibrations but also other properties, such as friction, thermal conductance, and stiffness, which the participants were deprived of in contactless conditions. Moreover, there is evidence in the literature [29], [30] that remote vibrotactile stimulus can alter the perception of another at the fingertip. However, we did not observe those in our experiments.…”
Section: A Comparison Of Virtual Textures To Their Real Counterpartsmentioning
confidence: 99%