Abstract:Masking has been used to study human perception of tactile stimuli, including those created on haptic touch screens. Earlier studies have investigated the effect of in-site masking on tactile perception of electrovibration. In this study, we investigated whether it is possible to change the detection threshold of electrovibration at fingertip of index finger via remote masking, i.e. by applying a (mechanical) vibrotactile stimulus on the proximal phalanx of the same finger. The masking stimuli were generated b… Show more
“…This behaviour is similar to the masking results reported in vibrotactile literature, which suggests a similar neural mechanism in detection and masking of electrovibration and vibrotactile stimuli. We refer readers to our earlier publication [25] for detailed comparison of our results with earlier studies and the possible reasons for the differences between the results.…”
Section: Mechanical Vs Neural Effects Of Maskingmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In this study, we build up on our earlier work [25] where the effect of directly applied mechanical vibrations on electrovibration absolute detection threshold was studied. We extended our research through studying the effect of similar mechanical vibration on electrovibration intensity difference threshold and explained the outcomes of experimental results using a model based on signal energies of hypothetical neural activations.…”
Masking has been used to study human perception of tactile stimuli, including those created by electrovibration on touch screens. Earlier studies have investigated the effect of on-site masking on tactile perception of electrovibration. In this study, we investigated whether it is possible to change the absolute detection threshold and intensity difference threshold of electrovibration at the fingertip of index finger via remote masking, i.e. by applying a (mechanical) vibrotactile stimulus on the proximal phalanx of the same finger. The masking stimuli were generated by a voice coil (the Haptuator). For 16 participants, we first measured the detection thresholds for electrovibration at the fingertip and for vibrotactile stimuli at the proximal phalanx. Then, the vibrations on the skin were measured at four different locations on the index finger of subjects to investigate how the mechanical masking stimulus propagated as the masking level was varied. Later, masked absolute thresholds of 8 participants were measured. Finally, for another group of 8 participants, intensity difference thresholds were measured in the presence/absence of vibrotactile masking stimuli. Our results show that vibrotactile masking stimuli generated sub-threshold vibrations around the fingertip, and hence, probably did not mechanically interfere with the electrovibration stimulus. However, there was a clear psychophysical masking effect due to central neural processes. We measured the effect of masking stimuli, up to 40 dB SL, on the difference threshold at four different intensity standards of electrovibration. We proposed two models based on hypothetical neural signals for prediction of the masking effect on intensity difference thresholds for electrovibration: amplitude and energy models. The energy model was able to predict the effect of masking more accurately, especially at high intensity masking levels.
“…This behaviour is similar to the masking results reported in vibrotactile literature, which suggests a similar neural mechanism in detection and masking of electrovibration and vibrotactile stimuli. We refer readers to our earlier publication [25] for detailed comparison of our results with earlier studies and the possible reasons for the differences between the results.…”
Section: Mechanical Vs Neural Effects Of Maskingmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In this study, we build up on our earlier work [25] where the effect of directly applied mechanical vibrations on electrovibration absolute detection threshold was studied. We extended our research through studying the effect of similar mechanical vibration on electrovibration intensity difference threshold and explained the outcomes of experimental results using a model based on signal energies of hypothetical neural activations.…”
Masking has been used to study human perception of tactile stimuli, including those created by electrovibration on touch screens. Earlier studies have investigated the effect of on-site masking on tactile perception of electrovibration. In this study, we investigated whether it is possible to change the absolute detection threshold and intensity difference threshold of electrovibration at the fingertip of index finger via remote masking, i.e. by applying a (mechanical) vibrotactile stimulus on the proximal phalanx of the same finger. The masking stimuli were generated by a voice coil (the Haptuator). For 16 participants, we first measured the detection thresholds for electrovibration at the fingertip and for vibrotactile stimuli at the proximal phalanx. Then, the vibrations on the skin were measured at four different locations on the index finger of subjects to investigate how the mechanical masking stimulus propagated as the masking level was varied. Later, masked absolute thresholds of 8 participants were measured. Finally, for another group of 8 participants, intensity difference thresholds were measured in the presence/absence of vibrotactile masking stimuli. Our results show that vibrotactile masking stimuli generated sub-threshold vibrations around the fingertip, and hence, probably did not mechanically interfere with the electrovibration stimulus. However, there was a clear psychophysical masking effect due to central neural processes. We measured the effect of masking stimuli, up to 40 dB SL, on the difference threshold at four different intensity standards of electrovibration. We proposed two models based on hypothetical neural signals for prediction of the masking effect on intensity difference thresholds for electrovibration: amplitude and energy models. The energy model was able to predict the effect of masking more accurately, especially at high intensity masking levels.
“…This result is unexpected because when humans interact with surfaces with their fingertips, they do not feel only contact vibrations but also other properties, such as friction, thermal conductance, and stiffness, which the participants were deprived of in contactless conditions. Moreover, there is evidence in the literature [29], [30] that remote vibrotactile stimulus can alter the perception of another at the fingertip. However, we did not observe those in our experiments.…”
Section: A Comparison Of Virtual Textures To Their Real Counterpartsmentioning
<p>Wearable tactile displays that relocate haptic feedback away from the fingertip can provide a much-needed sense of touch to interactions in virtual reality, while also leaving the fingertip free from occlusion for augmented and mixed reality tasks. However, the impact of relocation on perceptual sensitivity to dynamic changes in actuation during active movement remains unclear. In this work, we investigate the perceived realism of virtual textures rendered via vibrations relocated to the base of the index finger, and compare three different methods of modulating vibrations with active finger speed. Changing speed induced proportional scaling of either frequency or amplitude of vibration, or caused no scaling at all. In a series of psychophysical experiments, participants compared different types of modulation to each other, as well as to real 3D printed textured surfaces. Results suggest that frequency modulation results in more realistic sensations for coarser textures, whereas participants were less discerning of modulation type for finer textures. Additionally, we presented virtual textures either fully virtually in midair or under augmented reality in which the finger was in contact with a flat surface; while we found no overall difference in experimental performance, participants were divided by a strong preference for one condition or the other.</p>
“…This result is unexpected because when humans interact with surfaces with their fingertips, they do not feel only contact vibrations but also other properties, such as friction, thermal conductance, and stiffness, which the participants were deprived of in contactless conditions. Moreover, there is evidence in the literature [29], [30] that remote vibrotactile stimulus can alter the perception of another at the fingertip. However, we did not observe those in our experiments.…”
Section: A Comparison Of Virtual Textures To Their Real Counterpartsmentioning
<p>Wearable tactile displays that relocate haptic feedback away from the fingertip can provide a much-needed sense of touch to interactions in virtual reality, while also leaving the fingertip free from occlusion for augmented and mixed reality tasks. However, the impact of relocation on perceptual sensitivity to dynamic changes in actuation during active movement remains unclear. In this work, we investigate the perceived realism of virtual textures rendered via vibrations relocated to the base of the index finger, and compare three different methods of modulating vibrations with active finger speed. Changing speed induced proportional scaling of either frequency or amplitude of vibration, or caused no scaling at all. In a series of psychophysical experiments, participants compared different types of modulation to each other, as well as to real 3D printed textured surfaces. Results suggest that frequency modulation results in more realistic sensations for coarser textures, whereas participants were less discerning of modulation type for finer textures. Additionally, we presented virtual textures either fully virtually in midair or under augmented reality in which the finger was in contact with a flat surface; while we found no overall difference in experimental performance, participants were divided by a strong preference for one condition or the other.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.