Effect of Remote Masking on Tactile Perception of Electrovibration

Abstract

Masking has been used to study human perception of tactile stimuli, including those created by electrovibration on touch screens. Earlier studies have investigated the effect of on-site masking on tactile perception of electrovibration. In this study, we investigated whether it is possible to change the absolute detection threshold and intensity difference threshold of electrovibration at the fingertip of index finger via remote masking, i.e. by applying a (mechanical) vibrotactile stimulus on the proximal phalanx of the same finger. The masking stimuli were generated by a voice coil (the Haptuator). For 16 participants, we first measured the detection thresholds for electrovibration at the fingertip and for vibrotactile stimuli at the proximal phalanx. Then, the vibrations on the skin were measured at four different locations on the index finger of subjects to investigate how the mechanical masking stimulus propagated as the masking level was varied. Later, masked absolute thresholds of 8 participants were measured. Finally, for another group of 8 participants, intensity difference thresholds were measured in the presence/absence of vibrotactile masking stimuli. Our results show that vibrotactile masking stimuli generated sub-threshold vibrations around the fingertip, and hence, probably did not mechanically interfere with the electrovibration stimulus. However, there was a clear psychophysical masking effect due to central neural processes. We measured the effect of masking stimuli, up to 40 dB SL, on the difference threshold at four different intensity standards of electrovibration. We proposed two models based on hypothetical neural signals for prediction of the masking effect on intensity difference thresholds for electrovibration: amplitude and energy models. The energy model was able to predict the effect of masking more accurately, especially at high intensity masking levels.

Exploration Strategies for Tactile Graphics Displayed by Electrovibration on a Touchscreen

“…Tactile masking techniques could be utilized to increase tactile contrast and make the detection of edges easier (Vardar et al, 2018;Jamalzadeh et al, 2020), but following them would still be challenging. Here, it should be noted again that the exploration of 2D shapes embossed on a paper easily stimulates SA (Slowly-Adapting)-I receptors, which is not possible under electrovibration.…”

Measuring tactile sensitivity and mixed-reality-assisted exercise for carpal tunnel syndrome by ultrasound mid-air haptics

“…Most other haptic devices require the user to wear equipment, which may disrupt the sensations especially during movement because of skin-contact decoupling. Another novel technology, electrovibration displays, for example, only work efficiently if the user scans his/her finger(s) across the tactile surface with more or less constant force (Jamalzadeh et al, 2020). Therefore, ultrasound mid-air haptics and complementary hand tracking devices may improve user engagement during interaction with digital contents (Limerick et al, 2019).…”