2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2005.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of relaxation and primary nanocrystallization on the mechanical properties of Cu60Zr22Ti18 bulk metallic glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that nanocrystallization produced in different spraying conditions results in harder coatings. Concustell et al [32] also Fig. 4.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It is interesting to note that nanocrystallization produced in different spraying conditions results in harder coatings. Concustell et al [32] also Fig. 4.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…23,48) This result is in line with the negligible effect of structural relaxation caused by short-time annealing on the amount of plastic deformation as long as a critical minimum concentration of free volume still exists in the relaxed metallic glass, as it was already reported by other researchers. 49,50) The deformation mode is noted to become brittle without any microplasticity for the specimens annealed for 30 min or more implying a detrimental effect of annealing-induced nanocrystallization on the room temper- Specifically, the specimen annealed for 60 min shows a drastic decrease of its maximum strength down to 1327 MPa implying an annealing-induced embrittlement due to a long exposure time in the supercooled liquid region, during which the two onset exothermic events were passed through in the isothermal DSC curve shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the excessive free volume is introduced by plastic deformation, a less dense randomlypacked structure will be obtained, leading to less restriction on the shear-band movement and decrease in hardness of the amorphous alloys. [12] In some cases, the free-volume reduction and annihilation by annealing the samples below the glass-transition temperature (T g ) and above T g , respectively, may result in brittleness due to the reduced or absent propensity for the shear-band formation. [13][14][15][16] Thus, the change of the free volume and crystallization may yield different deformation and flow behaviors that may influence the wear performance of glass-forming alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%