1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00794789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pressing process parameters on the thermal conductivity of cold-pressed porous powder composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MnAl powder compacts used in our experiments are coldpressed powder materials. Therefore, in keeping with Gruzdev's findings [12], the large discrepancy observed in our study is not surprising.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MnAl powder compacts used in our experiments are coldpressed powder materials. Therefore, in keeping with Gruzdev's findings [12], the large discrepancy observed in our study is not surprising.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Depending on the method of manufacture of the powders, the individual powder is in a stressed condition with a large number of defects, which lowers its thermal conduc tivity. A similar observation existed in the investigation by Gruzdev et al [12]. With the aim of developing a method to predict the thermal conductivity of coldpressed porous powder materials (CPPMs), the following conclusions were reached.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This is actually not a surprising conclusion. The plastic behaviour of materials constituting the particles of very fine powders does not necessarily have to be identical to that of the bulk materials, despite having the same composition [36]. Depending on the powder manufacturing method, and its thermal and mechanical history as compared to that of tested bulk materials, the material of a particle is in a stressed (quenched) or relaxed condition that could affect its plasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these limits cannot be applied to powdered materials, since their maximum porosity is always much lower than 1. Only the expressions of Loeb [65], McLachlan [70], Gruzdev et al [71], Pabst and Gregorová [74], Solonin and Chernyshev [75] and Montes et al [72,[76][77][78] take this upper limit of porosity into account, being therefore applicable in the high porosity range of powdered materials. In addition, the expressions of McLachlan [70] and Montes et al [72,[76][77][78] are specific cases of Equation (1).…”
Section: G R Equation Formmentioning
confidence: 99%