2019
DOI: 10.1134/s002315841902006x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Preparation Methods on the Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Ni/CeO2 Catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Catalysts containing nickel on ceria or ceria–zirconia supports can be prepared by various synthesis techniques that results in samples with different structures and thus different catalytic performance. , In SEA, strong electronic forces bind metal precursors to the support, and this interaction is believed to introduce a stronger metal support interaction (SMSI) that persist during subsequent calcination and reduction steps. , Bulk synthesis methods incorporate Ni atoms into the CZ lattice to form a mixed-metal oxide and also induce SMSIs. ,,, …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catalysts containing nickel on ceria or ceria–zirconia supports can be prepared by various synthesis techniques that results in samples with different structures and thus different catalytic performance. , In SEA, strong electronic forces bind metal precursors to the support, and this interaction is believed to introduce a stronger metal support interaction (SMSI) that persist during subsequent calcination and reduction steps. , Bulk synthesis methods incorporate Ni atoms into the CZ lattice to form a mixed-metal oxide and also induce SMSIs. ,,, …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 In addition, the chemical and the textural properties of the support very often play a key role in the performance of the catalyst. 41 The most commonly studied and employed alumina support phases are γand α-Al 2 O 3. [42][43][44] While an important advantage of α-Al 2 O 3 is its structural stability, due to which it is industrially employed, its low surface area presents a major disadvantage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The catalytic performance of supported Ni catalysts depends on different factors including Ni‐support interactions, 13,38 Ni particle size, 39 and the type of Ni species on the surface, which affect different characteristics of the catalyst including reducibility 40 . In addition, the chemical and the textural properties of the support very often play a key role in the performance of the catalyst 41 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of nickel catalysts supported on Al 2 O 3 , 11–20 CeO 2 , 17,20–37 MgO, 21,22,30 TiO 2 , 21,22,38 SiO 2 , 13,38–40 and ZrO 2 (ref. 13, 38, and 41–44) have been studied in reforming processes of several renewable feeds, including methanol, 9 ethanol, 14–17,24,26,27,32–34,37,39,41 and glycerol. 11–13,20–23,25,28–31,35,36,38,40,42–44 Al 2 O 3 and CeO 2 as supports are considered effective in terms of high H 2 production and lower coke formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excellent stability of Ni/CeO 2 has been related to accelerated carbon removal from the metal surface due to the mobility of oxygen ions and formation of oxygen vacancies in the support. 46 Recent studies of Ni/CeO 2 systems in reforming processes are related to controlling the functional properties of catalysts through changing the morphology, 32,33,36 preparation methods, 24,28,34,35 active component content, 24 promoters, 26,47 and additives. 27,48,49…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%