2011
DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1146.2006.01704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Power Difference of Two Signal Sources on Resolving Performance of MUSIC Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 14 depicts the curves of ξ T versus the phase factor ϕ when the power ratio r and the amplitude factor |ρ| are set at 1 and 0.1, respectively. http://engine.scichina.com/doi/10.1007/s11432-011-4525-z From Figures 9-14 we can summarize the results for both the RARE and the MUSIC algorithm as follows: 1) The resolving threshold decreases as the number of snapshots improves; 2) The resolving threshold improves as the power ratio increases, which conforms to the results in [17]; 3) The resolving threshold improves very fast along with an increasing amplitude factor, but it takes a slow and periodical fluctuation when the phase factor increases, because how the two sources are correlated relies heavily on the amplitude factor; 4) The resolving threshold exhibits the characteristic of a convex function as the power ratio, but takes the property of a concave function as the amplitude factor, i.e., the increasing rate of the resolving threshold decreases as the power ratio increases, but increases as the amplitude factor increases.…”
Section: The Impacts Of the Source Parameters On The Mean Signal-to-nsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 14 depicts the curves of ξ T versus the phase factor ϕ when the power ratio r and the amplitude factor |ρ| are set at 1 and 0.1, respectively. http://engine.scichina.com/doi/10.1007/s11432-011-4525-z From Figures 9-14 we can summarize the results for both the RARE and the MUSIC algorithm as follows: 1) The resolving threshold decreases as the number of snapshots improves; 2) The resolving threshold improves as the power ratio increases, which conforms to the results in [17]; 3) The resolving threshold improves very fast along with an increasing amplitude factor, but it takes a slow and periodical fluctuation when the phase factor increases, because how the two sources are correlated relies heavily on the amplitude factor; 4) The resolving threshold exhibits the characteristic of a convex function as the power ratio, but takes the property of a concave function as the amplitude factor, i.e., the increasing rate of the resolving threshold decreases as the power ratio increases, but increases as the amplitude factor increases.…”
Section: The Impacts Of the Source Parameters On The Mean Signal-to-nsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Consequently, the RARE can be viewed as an extension of the MUSIC algorithm, or equivalently, the MUSIC algorithm is a special case of the RARE in the absence of array errors. The angle resolution performance of the MUSIC algorithm has been studied in [14][15][16][17][18]. Therefore, in this paper, we focus on the angle resolution performance of the RARE.…”
Section: Array Signal Model and The Rank Reduction Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations