2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of NOM characteristics and membrane type on microfiltration performance

Abstract: Efforts to understand and predict the role of different organic fractions in the fouling of low-pressure membranes are presented. Preliminary experiments with an experimental apparatus that incorporates automatic backwashing and filtration over several days has shown that microfiltration of the hydrophilic fractions leads to rapid flux decline and the formation of a cake or gel layer, while the hydrophobic fractions show a steady flux decline and no obvious formation of a gel or cake layer. The addition of cal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…O comprimento de onda que tem sido mais utilizado é o de 254 nm. (BERTHE;REDONB;FEUILLADE, 2008;GRAYA et al, 2007). Dessa forma, utilizou-se esse comprimento de onda como parâmetro para verifi car a estabilidade das frações de SH.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…O comprimento de onda que tem sido mais utilizado é o de 254 nm. (BERTHE;REDONB;FEUILLADE, 2008;GRAYA et al, 2007). Dessa forma, utilizou-se esse comprimento de onda como parâmetro para verifi car a estabilidade das frações de SH.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…A pretreatment of water using coagulation process is proposed to reduce the level of pore constriction by hydrophobic compounds. The coagulation process is known to preferentially remove the hydrophobic and charged compounds (Gray et al 2007). …”
Section: Membrane Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While MBR batch studies [15,16] were conducted for the removal of some micropollutants, membrane types were investigated in other studies [17,18]. One study on natural organic matter (NOM) removal investigated using hollowfiber (HF) membranes-two hydrophobic and one hydrophilic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study on natural organic matter (NOM) removal investigated using hollowfiber (HF) membranes-two hydrophobic and one hydrophilic. Hydrophobic ones fouled more quickly because hydrophilic compounds formed a gel layer on the surface of the membrane [17]. Another study on membrane type and materials was conducted using three different MF membranes with the same pore sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%