2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of nano Nb and V carbides on the hydrogen interaction in tempered martensitic steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for manganese sulfide (MnS), the most favorable trapping site is the sulfur atom with E b = 1.28 eV compared with E b = 0.88 eV for the manganese atom (Mn). These results follow the trend in earlier results reported in the literature [20,39]. In the last section, we discuss the effect of the layer on the trapping capacity of the carbides.…”
Section: Interaction Of the Metal Carbides (Nbc Tic Vc And Mns) With ...supporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, for manganese sulfide (MnS), the most favorable trapping site is the sulfur atom with E b = 1.28 eV compared with E b = 0.88 eV for the manganese atom (Mn). These results follow the trend in earlier results reported in the literature [20,39]. In the last section, we discuss the effect of the layer on the trapping capacity of the carbides.…”
Section: Interaction Of the Metal Carbides (Nbc Tic Vc And Mns) With ...supporting
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, it is well known that limited hydrogen diffusion may be sufficient to provoke a failure. Numerous studies have also found that the addition of microalloying elements (Nb, Ti, V, and Mo) might improve the HE resistance of steel [20]. In addition, metal carbide (MC) nanoprecipitates not only optimize the microstructure and improve the mechanical properties but also increase the hydrogen trap density in high-strength martensitic steels to improve HE resistance [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, there is a necessity for processes to maximize quality and yield while minimizing consumption and waste. Processes that are more indiscriminate in the quality or nature of the input feedstocks yet capable of producing reasonable quality outputs (like the Fischer–Tropsch technology for the production of liquid fuels from simple gases , [ 6,7 ] see Figure ) would win over processes that demand high purity of inputs or very complex processing environments to deliver a comparable, be it a better product that fulfils the same function. [ 8,9 ] Ideally, of course, we would like to develop process that deliver on all fronts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%