1977
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1977.tb01889.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of monthly professional mechanical tooth cleaning on periodontal health in adults

Abstract: The beneficial effects of comprehensive dental prophylaxis programs are well recognized. In order to study the factors determining the effectiveness of these programs, 28 periodontal recall patients were subjected to monthly professional mechanical tooth cleanings. Experimental and control teeth were randomly selected according to a splitmouth cross-over method. The Plaque and Gingival indices were recorded 1 month prior to the study, at the start, and at 4, 8, and 12 months. One month prior to the study calcu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(13 reference statements)
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial plaque scores group of patients who did not receive instrucwere significantly reduced in the self-examina-tion in oral hygiene (De). This finding corroborates the results of a previous study (Glavind 1977) in which the effect of scaling was evaluated using a split mouth design. The distribution of patients in the various groups according to their plaque scores recorded at 7 and 13 months (P: patients with a 7-month plaque score less than 20%; Q: patients with a 7-month plaque score higher than 20% but reduced to less than 20% following the tooth brushing test; R: patients with a 7-month plaque score higher than 20% after the tooth brushing test) given a self-educational tnanual in oral hygiene technique (Glavind et al 1981) and with other studies demonstrating short-tertn irnprovements following oral hygiene instruction (Eegler et al 1971, Elliott et al 1972, Gjermo 1972, Bellini et al 1974, Dennison et al, 1974, Morrison et al 1980.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The initial plaque scores group of patients who did not receive instrucwere significantly reduced in the self-examina-tion in oral hygiene (De). This finding corroborates the results of a previous study (Glavind 1977) in which the effect of scaling was evaluated using a split mouth design. The distribution of patients in the various groups according to their plaque scores recorded at 7 and 13 months (P: patients with a 7-month plaque score less than 20%; Q: patients with a 7-month plaque score higher than 20% but reduced to less than 20% following the tooth brushing test; R: patients with a 7-month plaque score higher than 20% after the tooth brushing test) given a self-educational tnanual in oral hygiene technique (Glavind et al 1981) and with other studies demonstrating short-tertn irnprovements following oral hygiene instruction (Eegler et al 1971, Elliott et al 1972, Gjermo 1972, Bellini et al 1974, Dennison et al, 1974, Morrison et al 1980.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Failure to maintain the improved plaque control during the experimental period and the resulting gradual deterioration in gingival health confirmed that it is difficult for individuals to maintain their gingival health, without regular and frequent professional intervention (15). AxELSSON & LINDHE (16) have demonstrated that a high level of oral hygiene can be maintained over extended periods by regularly repeating oral hygiene instruction and scaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[7][8][9][10] However, more recent studies do not support the effi cacy of the sole provision of the dental prophylaxis procedure for the prevention of gingivitis. [11][12][13][14] In partial support, in an earlier Cochrane review, 15 insuffi cient evidence of either benefi cial or adverse effects of routine scaling and polishing was found. This was a review of different time intervals and was for periodontal health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For an appropriate decision, it is essential to determine the effect of the dental prophylaxis procedure alone, without OHI. Studies that followed the methodology consistent with prophylaxis alone 11,12 concluded that there was no signifi cant difference between the experimental population with prophylaxis and control population without prophylaxis with respect to the gingival health. This suggests that the reduced severity of gingivitis, seen in the earlier studies, was attributable to factors other than the dental prophylaxis.…”
Section: Caries Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%