2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of meaning on apraxic finger imitation deficits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
22
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, as mentioned previously, the finger imitation task likely engages a more complex network of (semantic and non-semantic) processes ( Achilles et al., 2016 ) than the hand imitation task. This might explain some of the wider variability between the hand and finger imitation scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, as mentioned previously, the finger imitation task likely engages a more complex network of (semantic and non-semantic) processes ( Achilles et al., 2016 ) than the hand imitation task. This might explain some of the wider variability between the hand and finger imitation scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The gestures employed in Goldenberg's test were originally meant to be ‘meaningless’, in the sense that they conveyed no direct semantic content. However, this characterization has been challenged with a recent analysis suggesting that most of the finger gestures can be interpreted as meaningful ( Achilles et al., 2016 ). The difference is important because meaningful and meaningless gestures might be processed differently in the brain ( Rumiati et al., 2009 ), which raises the possibility that any apparently body-part-specific differences that we find might in fact be driven by semantics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have suggested that these tasks are strongly reliant on different areas of the brain (Goldenberg and Karnath 2006 ; Goldenberg and Randerath 2015 ; Goldenberg 2001 , 2009 ), whilst others propose a shared network (Achilles et al 2017 ). Our hand and finger gestures were not designed in keeping with these classical distinctions, and the focus on meaningless action in previous reports makes it hard for us to draw parallels with existing neuropsychological work (but see Achilles et al 2016 ). However, given that our hand gesture stimuli clearly show greater wrist position variability compared to the finger gesture stimuli, it is feasible the effect of rTMS over the left pMTG on wrist velocity has something to do with the postural aspects of the imitation task (i.e., the hand position relative to other parts of the body).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A patient study by Achilles et al (2016) provides some support for the above. Left-hemisphere stroke patients with and without apraxia were asked to rate the familiarity of meaningless gestures, which they imitated.…”
Section: Regions Identified In Our Task That Form Part Of the Action mentioning
confidence: 75%