Effect of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation on Sinus Membrane Thickness in Computed Tomography

Pommer, Bernhard; Dvorak, Gabriella; Jesch, Philip; Palmer, Richard; Watzek, Georg; Gahleitner, André

doi:10.1902/jop.2011.110345

Cited by 34 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, 38 studies were eventually excluded for not meeting the strict inclusion criteria, and 31 studies that reported SMT were considered for qualitative analysis (Table 1). 12,13,15‐18,23‐47 Those studies reporting range or unclear data were excluded for the quantitative analysis (Fig. 1).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Overall, 19 studies 13,15,17,18,23‐37 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for quantitative assessment. Mean ± SE SMT was 1.17 ± 0.1 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89 to 1.44).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies reporting smoking (n = 8 to be meta‐analyzed) 13,18,23,25,30,35‐37 showed high heterogeneity (weighted SSQ for error = 37.48; df = 6; P <0.001). As such, the regression analysis from the random‐effects model demonstrated that, even in the lack of statistical significance, there is a near‐trend significance ( P = 0.11).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Schneiderian Membrane Thickness and Clinical Implications for Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Regression Analyses

Monje

Diaz

Aranda

et al. 2016

Journal of Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Overall, 19 studies 13,15,17,18,23‐37 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for quantitative assessment. Mean ± SE SMT was 1.17 ± 0.1 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89 to 1.44).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Schneiderian Membrane Thickness and Clinical Implications for Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Regression Analyses

Monje

Diaz

Aranda

et al. 2016

Journal of Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, others studies show in contrast a signifi cant increase in sinus membrane thickness following SFE (Pommer et al 2011 ).…”

Section: Remodelingmentioning

confidence: 85%

Clinical and Radiological Assessment and Planning in Sinus Floor Elevation

Nasseh

Younes

2014

Sinus Grafting Techniques

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…3 The most frequent complication is perforation of the Schneiderian membrane with the incidence ranging between 8.6% and 59.8%. 6,7 The thickness of maxillary sinus membrane may be affected by the local and patient-related factors. 6,7 The thickness of maxillary sinus membrane may be affected by the local and patient-related factors.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of clinical local factors on thickness and morphology of Schneiderian membrane: A retrospective clinical study

Ramanauskaitė

Ataman-Duruel

Duruel

et al. 2019

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: It was informed that the thickness of maxillary sinus membrane may be affected by the local and patient-related factors in the literature.Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate factors that may have an influence of the thickness and morphology of the maxillary sinus membrane. Materials and Methods:A total of 414 cone beam computed tomography images of 207 patients were evaluated. Radiographic parameters were evaluated at each maxillary premolar and molar tooth regions. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the association between the maxillary sinus mucosa thickness and morphology. The following factors including gender, periodontal bone loss (PBL), bone density, amount of residual alveolar bone at the edentulous space, vitality of the teeth present, and anatomical relationship between the sinus floor and posterior teeth were evaluated. Results:The mean thickness of maxillary sinus membrane ranged between 1.47 to 2.92 mm and was significantly thicker in male subjects (P < .05). Positive correlation was detected between the sinus membrane thickness values in each posterior tooth region (P < .05). Thickening of the membrane was noted in 53% of the scans. The most commonly observed morphological change was flat thickening of the membrane (21%). No correlation was found between the evaluated local factors on the thickness and morphology of the maxillary sinus membrane (P > .05).Conclusions: Tooth vitality, residual alveolar bone height, and PBL seem to have no effect on the thickness and morphology of the maxillary sinus membrane. K E Y W O R D SCBCT imaging, computerized tomography, maxillary sinus, sinus floor elevation

show abstract

Effect of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation on Sinus Membrane Thickness in Computed Tomography

Cited by 34 publications

References 26 publications

Schneiderian Membrane Thickness and Clinical Implications for Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Regression Analyses

Schneiderian Membrane Thickness and Clinical Implications for Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Regression Analyses

Clinical and Radiological Assessment and Planning in Sinus Floor Elevation

Effects of clinical local factors on thickness and morphology of Schneiderian membrane: A retrospective clinical study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About