1996
DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)88713-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of manufacturing tolerances on the micromotion at the Morse taper interface in modular hip implants using the finite element technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
40
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher surface roughness may locally increase and evenly distribute the contact pressure [2] and thus decrease micro-motions between both components. The reported effect of increased micro-motion and fretting depending on the cone angle difference [20,23] was not seen in this study. The implants showed different patterns with respect to progression in titanium release over time.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Higher surface roughness may locally increase and evenly distribute the contact pressure [2] and thus decrease micro-motions between both components. The reported effect of increased micro-motion and fretting depending on the cone angle difference [20,23] was not seen in this study. The implants showed different patterns with respect to progression in titanium release over time.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…There are also no internationally agreed standards for the manufacturing tolerances or surface finishes of such tapers and trunnions. From failures of contemporary THRs, it has been shown that the area of concern is the taper junction of the prostheses (Bishop et al, 2013;Langton et al, 2012;Munir et al, 2015;Shareef and Levine, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 It is therefore prudent to prevent bacterial colonisation by having a tight seal at the implant-abutment interface. Three main factors have been identified as possible causes for the formation of microgaps: occlusal load during physiological function, 11 manufacturing tolerance 12 and micromotion between the implant-abutment connection. Different types of abutment connections have been reported to produce different magnitudes of micromotion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%