1962
DOI: 10.2527/jas1962.214787x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Levels of Meat and Bone Scraps on Growth Rate and Feed Efficiency of Growing-Finishing Swine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

1964
1964
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Os resultados obtidos por Peo & Hudman (1962), em três experimentos com suínos, somente demonstraram redução significativa na taxa de crescimento nos animais alimentados com rações contendo 10% de farinha de carne e ossos.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Os resultados obtidos por Peo & Hudman (1962), em três experimentos com suínos, somente demonstraram redução significativa na taxa de crescimento nos animais alimentados com rações contendo 10% de farinha de carne e ossos.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…As dietas experimentais foram formuladas para atender às exigências nutricionais dos leitões na fase, conforme recomendações de Rostagno et al (1992). A composição centesimal e os valores nutricionais das dietas experimentais são apresentados na Tabela 1.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Pigs fed with the soybean meal diet had a similar growth rate but a lower FI and the best G : F ratio. Early research in pigs indicated that growth performance decreased with increasing levels of meat and bone meal in diets (Peo and Hudman 1962;Evans and Leibholz 1979). We hypothesised that skin-derived protein limits the growth of pigs at the level of 1.5%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…p REVIOUS work at this station (Peo and Hudman, 1962) has shown that meat and bone scraps, when fed at levels from 5 to 10% of the total ration, significantly depress rate of gain of growing-finishing swine. Similar results have been reported by Bloss et al (1953), Terrill et al (1954), Meade and Teter (1957), and Becker and Jensen (1961).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%