Effect of inoculation with a thermotolerant plant growth promoting<i>Pseudomonas putida</i>strain AKMP7 on growth of wheat (<i>Triticum</i>spp.) under heat stress

Ali, Shaik Zulfikar; Vardharajula, Sandhya; Grover, Monendra; Linga, Venkateswar Rao; Venkateswarlu, B.

doi:10.1080/17429145.2010.545147

Cited by 194 publications

(91 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Inoculated plants had increased biomass, shoot and root length, and seed size. ROS generation under stress treatment was also lessened, with lower levels of expression observed for ROS response genes such as superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, and catalase [45]. Similar results have been found with sorghum and other Pseudomonas putida AKMP strains [46].…”

Section: Key Mechanisms Targeted By Humic and Fulvic Acid Based Biostsupporting

confidence: 80%

The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants

Oosten

Pepe

Pascale

et al. 2017

Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric.

618

399

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of bioeffectors, formally known as plant biostimulants, has become common practice in agriculture and provides a number of benefits in stimulating growth and protecting against stress. A biostimulant is loosely defined as an organic material and/or microorganism that is applied to enhance nutrient uptake, stimulate growth, enhance stress tolerance or crop quality. This review is intended to provide a broad overview of known effects of biostimulants and their ability to improve tolerance to abiotic stresses. Inoculation or application of extracts from algae or other plants have beneficial effects on growth and stress adaptation. Algal extracts, protein hydrolysates, humic and fulvic acids, and other compounded mixtures have properties beyond basic nutrition, often enhancing growth and stress tolerance. Non-pathogenic bacteria capable of colonizing roots and the rhizosphere also have a number of positive effects. These effects include higher yield, enhanced nutrient uptake and utilization, increased photosynthetic activity, and resistance to both biotic and abiotic stresses. While most biostimulants have numerous and diverse effects on plant growth, this review focuses on the bioprotective effects against abiotic stress. Agricultural biostimulants may contribute to make agriculture more sustainable and resilient and offer an alternative to synthetic protectants which have increasingly falling out of favour with consumers. An extensive review of the literature shows a clear role for a diverse number of biostimulants that have protective effects against abiotic stress but also reveals the urgent need to address the underlying mechanisms responsible for these effects.

show abstract

Section: Key Mechanisms Targeted By Humic and Fulvic Acid Based Biostsupporting

confidence: 80%

The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants

Oosten

Pepe

Pascale

et al. 2017

Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric.

618

399

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Comparing the effect of rhizobacterial isolates, the TAN1 showed maximum root length than other isolates and uninoculated control (Figure 1). Ali et al (2011) found that inoculation of PGPR significantly increased the root and shoot length and dry biomass of wheat over uninoculated plants. Significant increases in growth and in yield of agronomically important crops in response to inoculation with PGPR have been found in an experiment at Recife, Brazil (Figueiredo et al 2008).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

ACC-deaminase and/or nitrogen-fixing rhizobacteria and growth response of tomato (Lycopersicon pimpinellfoliumMill.)

Hassan

David

Bashir³

2014

Journal of Plant Interactions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study aimed to identify and select important plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and examine the response of tomato growth upon inoculation. Inoculation with rhizobacterial isolates increased all the measured physical, chemical, and enzymatic growth parameters compared to control. However, the TAN1 isolate had the highest effect, and significantly (P < 0.05) increased the root length (8.25-fold), root fresh (8.36-fold) and dry (12.6-fold) weight, shoot length (6.92-fold), shoot fresh (7.18-fold) and dry (6.90-fold) weight, number of leaves (11.0-fold), chlorophyll a (6.25-fold), chlorophyll b (10.7-fold), carotenoid contents (8.80-fold), seedlings fresh (9.0-fold) and dry (8.71-fold) weight, plant macronutrient uptake, i.e. N (7.7-and 8.9-fold), P (10.5-and 11.4-fold), K (7.8-and 8.8-fold), , and Mg (12.6-and 9-fold) in shoot and root, plant micronutrient uptake, i.e. Zn (6.6-, 10.2-), Cu (9.3-, and 10.3-fold), Fe (7.7-and 10.7-fold), and Mn (4.7-and 5.7-fold) in shoot and root and plant antioxidant enzymes, i.e. glutathione S-transferase (10.7-fold), peroxidase (8.1-fold), and catalase (10.5-fold). Our results concluded that inoculation of agricultural crops with rhizobacteria is a very useful approach to increase the plant growth. The rhizobacteria having both 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase and nitrogen-fixing activity are more effective than rhizobacteria possessing either ACC-deaminase or nitrogen-fixing activity alone for growth promotion of crops.Keywords: PGPR; ACC-deaminase; nitrogen fixation; ethylene and auxin; tomato IntroductionPlant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are free living microorganisms having beneficial effects on plants by colonizing their roots (Ahemad 2012). PGPR promote the plant growth by several direct and indirect ways (Ahemad 2012). Directly, PGPR provide the bacterium-synthesized compounds to the plants, facilitate the nutrient availability and uptake and production of certain phytohormones, e.g. auxin, cytokinins, ethylene, and abscisic acid and giberelins (Ahemad 2012). Indirectly, PGPR minimize or prevent the harmful effects of pathogenic organisms (Ahemad & Malik 2011), moreover, mobilize the nutrients in soils and improve the soil structure (Ahemad & Malik 2011). Inoculation of agricultural crops with PGPR results in multiple positive effects on plant, e.g. increase in the plant growth and vigor, increment in the chlorophyll, protein, proline, and antioxidant enzymes (e.g. peroxidase (POX), catalase, and glutathione reductase) activity that increase the plant immunity (Sahran & Nehra 2011). It has been observed that increased activity of antioxidant enzymes is correlated with resistance, against both biotic and abiotic stresses, in many plant species (Jan et al. 2011).At present, the use of microorganisms with the aim of improving crop production on sustainable basis has increased tremendously in various parts of the world (Glick 2012). This is due to the emerging demand for dependence diminishing of synthetic chemical products, to the grow...

show abstract

“…Wheat (T. aestivum) [202] Heat stress Pseudomonas putida AKMP7 Wheat (Triticum spp) [98] Temperature Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pantoea agglomerans, Mycobacterium sp Wheat (T. aestivum) [203] Salinity Azospirillum Wheat (T. aestivum) [62] Salinity Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas extremorientalis, Pseudomonas chlororaphis and Pseudomonas aurantiaca.…”

Section: Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens and Azospirillum Brasilensementioning

confidence: 99%

“…[95][96][97]. Ali et al used P. putida AKMP7 resulting in significant increase in proline levels in heat-stressed wheat plants [98].…”

Section: Accumulation Of Osmolytesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Soil Beneficial Bacteria in Wheat Production: A Review

Çakmakçı¹,

Turan²,

Kıtır³

et al. 2017

Wheat Improvement, Management and Utilization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Free-living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have favourable effect on plant growth, tolerance against stresses and are considered as a promising alternative to inorganic fertilizer for promoting plant growth, yield and quality. PGPR colonize at the plant root, increase germination rates, promote root growth, yield, leaf area, chlorophyll content, nitrogen content, protein content, tolerance to drought, shoot and root weight, and delayed leaf senescence. Several important bacterial characteristics, such as biological nitrogen fixation, solubilization of inorganic phosphate and mineralization of organic phosphate, nutrient uptake, 1-aminocydopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase activity and production of siderophores and phytohormones, can be assessed as plant growth promotion traits. By efficient use, PGPR is expected to contribute to agronomic efficiency, chiefly by decreasing costs and environmental pollution, by eliminating harmful chemicals. This review discusses various bacteria acting as PGPR, their genetic diversity, screening strategies, working principles, applications for wheat and future aspects in terms of efficiency, mechanisms and the desirable properties. The elucidation of the diverse mechanisms will enable microorganisms developing agriculture further.

show abstract

Effect of inoculation with a thermotolerant plant growth promotingPseudomonas putidastrain AKMP7 on growth of wheat (Triticumspp.) under heat stress

Cited by 194 publications

References 40 publications

The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants

The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants

ACC-deaminase and/or nitrogen-fixing rhizobacteria and growth response of tomato (Lycopersicon pimpinellfoliumMill.)

The Role of Soil Beneficial Bacteria in Wheat Production: A Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About