2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00872.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect ofLolium perennesward density on productivity under simulated and actual cattle grazing

Abstract: The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.; PRG) sward density on seasonal and total DM yield under simulated grazing and animal grazing by cattle, and to assess the effectiveness of visually estimated ground scores (GSs) for predicting sward PRG density. The study incorporated five different seeding rates of PRG, each replicated three times, to simulate swards ranging in PRG density typical of different ages and conditions. There was no significant differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of difference between cutting and grazing in the PRG‐only swards in the current study supports findings by Creighton et al () and Cashman et al (). While these authors did not report a decrease in production in response to defoliation method, DM yields were more variable under grazing compared to cutting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of difference between cutting and grazing in the PRG‐only swards in the current study supports findings by Creighton et al () and Cashman et al (). While these authors did not report a decrease in production in response to defoliation method, DM yields were more variable under grazing compared to cutting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Herbage DM production can be evaluated under both cutting and grazing (Creighton et al, 2012), with cutting being the most efficient method with respect to available resources within most research and evaluating institutes. Sward productivity under cutting is higher (Binnie & Chestnutt, 1991) and more stable (Creighton et al, 2012) than under grazing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, higher herbage yield under cutting compared to grazing were observed by Binnie and Chestnutt [24] and Jackson and Williams [25]. In contrast, Creighton et al [26] found no difference in herbage production between grazing and cutting; Lantinga et al [27] found 10% higher herbage production in animal-grazed swards compared to cutting swards at 250 kg N ha -1 , whereas the difference disappeared at 550 kg N ha -1 . These contrasting effects were probably attributed to differential effects of grazing and cutting on plant species, consequently influencing sward structure [28], productivity and persistence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on the impact of ryegrass seeding rate on herbage accumulation has produced inconsistent results. Some studies reported greater herbage accumulation from higher seeding rates (>18 kg seed per ha) for the first 2 years after sowing (Creighton et al, 2012;Culleton & Murphy, 1987;Venuto, Redfearn, Pitman, & Alison, 2004), while others reported that the yield advantage from higher seeding rates dissipated after the first year (Culleton, Murphy, & O'Keefe, 1986;Keane, 1980). Conversely, others reported similar total herbage accumulation across a range of seeding rates for 1-3 years after sowing (Brougham, 1952;Frame & Boyd, 1986;Heddle & Herriott, 1954).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%