2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.09.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of high tannin grain sorghum on gastrointestinal parasite fecal egg counts in goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no effect on the parasite count of adults recovered from goats (Costa-Júnior et al ., 2014). The supplementation of goats with sorghum grains, containing high levels of condensed tannins, and the administration of commercial preparation of condensed tannins obtained from the bark of A. mearnsii did not significantly influence EPG (Whitley et al ., 2009; Max, 2010). According to Costa-Júnior et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was no effect on the parasite count of adults recovered from goats (Costa-Júnior et al ., 2014). The supplementation of goats with sorghum grains, containing high levels of condensed tannins, and the administration of commercial preparation of condensed tannins obtained from the bark of A. mearnsii did not significantly influence EPG (Whitley et al ., 2009; Max, 2010). According to Costa-Júnior et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, acacia ( Acacia Mill .) extracts containing tannins were found to be effective in killing GINs in sheep [ 5 ] and it was suggested that feeding tannin-rich plants could control GIN infection [ 6 ]. Recently, biologic control of GINs in small ruminants is becoming more common, especially using nematode predatory fungi to kill nematodes [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from previous studies suggested that feeding forages that contain bioactive CT to ruminants effectively inhibits CH 4 produced during enteric fermentation (Huang et al, 2011;Pellikaan et al, 2011;Puchala et al, 2012). A major question raised by these reports is: what causes CT from some plant sources to be bioactive (Cenci et al, 2007;Brunet et al, 2008;Terrill et al, 2009), whereas CT from others demonstrate almost no bioactivity (Pomroy and Adlington, 2006;Whitley et al, 2009) in the ruminant animal? Molecular weight could be an important factor in the bioactivity of CT, such that as molecular weight of CT increases, bioactivity also increases (Bate-Smith, 1973;Peleg et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%