2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of heat-press conditions on electrospun membranes for desalination by direct contact membrane distillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
48
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
10
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the previous study [24], Figure 6 shows that the LEP of the neat membrane was the lowest, contributing to the rapid wetting in DCMD. After the membrane was heat-pressed, the LEP increased dramatically from 73 kPa to 91 kPa owing to the vastly decreased average pore diameter and increased crystallinity, although the contact angle decreased from 153 • to 142 • owing to the reduced roughness [24]. Annealing the HP membranes does not result in a significant change of the LEP as the effect of the increased pore sizes is offset by the increase in the hydrophobicity of the membranes, indicated by the increased contact angle.…”
Section: Lep and Contact Anglesupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with the previous study [24], Figure 6 shows that the LEP of the neat membrane was the lowest, contributing to the rapid wetting in DCMD. After the membrane was heat-pressed, the LEP increased dramatically from 73 kPa to 91 kPa owing to the vastly decreased average pore diameter and increased crystallinity, although the contact angle decreased from 153 • to 142 • owing to the reduced roughness [24]. Annealing the HP membranes does not result in a significant change of the LEP as the effect of the increased pore sizes is offset by the increase in the hydrophobicity of the membranes, indicated by the increased contact angle.…”
Section: Lep and Contact Anglesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The as-spun membrane has an average pore diameter of 1.3 µm and a much wider range (from 0.8 µm to 2.2 µm) than the other samples. The heat-pressed membrane (HP) has the smallest average pore size (1.1 µm) and a much smaller range of the pore diameter compared with the neat membranes because the fibers were deformed and widened under high pressure at 150 • C [24]. Annealing the HP membranes for one day can further narrowed the pore size distribution, although the mean pore diameter increased slightly from 1.1 µm to 1.2 µm.…”
Section: Improvement Of Membrane Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations