2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of grout properties on shear strength of column base connections: FEA and analytical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the analysed case, the axial pressure force equals N Ed =0, so the bearing capacity of the single anchor is: The design bearing capacity of the joint F 2,vb,Rd , as well as the analytical prediction proposed by Shaheen et al [4], are presented in Figure 10. As it could be observed, experimental results are approximately 1.5 times larger than the design resistance defined in Eurocode 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the analysed case, the axial pressure force equals N Ed =0, so the bearing capacity of the single anchor is: The design bearing capacity of the joint F 2,vb,Rd , as well as the analytical prediction proposed by Shaheen et al [4], are presented in Figure 10. As it could be observed, experimental results are approximately 1.5 times larger than the design resistance defined in Eurocode 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The estimation of the deformation at the moment of failure given by Shaheen at al. [4] fits the slip at the ultimate load that was measured during the testing. The difference that exists in the initial part of the diagram is attributed to the grout properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the compressive strength, indirect tensile strength and elastic modulus of AMGs, the model that gives the best correlation is the following: y = a(b + WC c )(d + AR e )(f + AGE g ) + h (5) where y is the dependent variable corresponding to the examined strength property; a, b, c, d, e, f, g and h are coefficients calculated from the regression analysis; WC is the water to cement ratio; AR is the percentage of the acrylic resin dosage and AGE is the curing time in days. The values of the regression coefficients and R 2 , for each mechanical property, are given in Table 11.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Admixtures contribute significantly to the production of grouts with superior physical or mechanical properties compared to those obtained with the use of neat cementitious materials. Their use leads to improved grouting effectiveness in many construction projects, that require soil improvement and foundation strengthening of seismically weak buildings, ground stabilisation for tunnel construction, grout injection in cracks for the restoration of concrete buildings and grouting of pre-stressed cables in pre-stressed concrete structures, as well as reinforcing the base plate of steel frame structures [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, there are two analytical methods for predicting the capacity of structural components: the component-based method and the curve fitting method. The former method is widely used for predicting steel and steel-concrete composite connection behaviour [76,77].…”
Section: Bolt Strength Reduction Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%