2011
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Four Different Placement Techniques on Marginal Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations: An in vitro Study

Abstract: Background and objectives This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of different placement techniques (bulk, oblique incremental, centripetal and split horizontal) on marginal microleakage in class II composite restoration. Method Standardized class II preparations were made in 40 caries-free extracted molars and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10): (1) Bulk technique (2) oblique incremental insertion technique,(3) centripetal incremental insertion technique and (4) split horizontal incremental … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study, it was reported that the nanofillers in the adhesive systems were filtered by the collagen mesh and held on the surface of the hybrid layer, thus behaving like a stressabsorbing intermediate layer (17)(18)(19). Although it was very similar to this study, Nadig et al (11) observed higher microleakage scores on both sides of the cavity, especially more at the gingival margin. The only difference between the preferred adhesive systems was the absence of silica nanofillers in the previous study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study, it was reported that the nanofillers in the adhesive systems were filtered by the collagen mesh and held on the surface of the hybrid layer, thus behaving like a stressabsorbing intermediate layer (17)(18)(19). Although it was very similar to this study, Nadig et al (11) observed higher microleakage scores on both sides of the cavity, especially more at the gingival margin. The only difference between the preferred adhesive systems was the absence of silica nanofillers in the previous study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, an oblique layering method has been developed which allows the transfer of shrinkage stresses to unbound free surfaces (9) by determining that the most important effect of the cavity geometry during polymerization is the configuration factor (10). Thereafter, different methods, such as centripetal and split horizontal incremental techniques applied in Class II cavities, were developed with the same principles (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons of the horizontal and the oblique technique does not show such a coherent result. Studies of some authors demonstrate no significant difference [26,27], whereas other researchers suggest the use of the oblique technique [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Teknik penumpatan yang dapat mengurangi nilai c-factor adalah teknik incremental yang merupakan teknik penumpatan resin komposit secara bertahap. 4 Berdasarkan penelitian Roppa dkk., 9 teknik incremental menghasilkan kebocoran mikro yang lebih kecil dibandingkan penumpatan secara sekaligus (bulk) pada resin komposit konvensional. …”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…21,22 Semakin kecil polymerization shrinkage stress yang terbentuk semakin kecil kebocoran mikro yang terjadi. 9,24 Kebocoran mikro pada resin komposit bulk- ll juga dapat dipengaruhi oleh teknik kondensasi selama penumpatan. 26 Pada penelitian ini penulis tidak mengendalikan tekanan kondensasi sehingga tekanan yang diberikan pada tiap-tiap sampel berbeda, selain itu polymerization srinkage stress seharusnya dapat diukur besaran nilainya menggunakan alat tensiometer.…”
Section: Pembahasanunclassified