2005
DOI: 10.1080/10519990500280891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of exposure inside the Large Helical Device vessel on the optical properties of stainless steel mirrors

Abstract: During the third experimental campaign, three stainless steel mirrors were exposed inside the Large Helical Device (LHD) vacuum vessel and, in order to measure the change in their spectral reflectance R(λ), the effect of this exposure was measured at normal incidence (λ = 200-700 nm). The mirrors located in the divertor region and in the diagnostic port became coated with carbon-based films; however, the mirror placed closest to the plasma confinement volume became cleaner than it had initially been. The chara… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22) without degradation of the mirror optical properties because of the low ion energy. A similar procedure with exploitation of a low temperature ECR plasma was successfully used to remove a carbon layer that appeared during exposition of mirrors in the LHD heliotron [66], the TRIAM-1 tokamak [67], in the test stand DSM-2, and similarly, of mirrors exposed in DIII-D and TEXTOR in the toroidal stand TOMAS [68]. A high efficiency of chemical cleaning of hydrocarbon films was demonstrated in ref [69].…”
Section: Removal Of Deposited Filmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22) without degradation of the mirror optical properties because of the low ion energy. A similar procedure with exploitation of a low temperature ECR plasma was successfully used to remove a carbon layer that appeared during exposition of mirrors in the LHD heliotron [66], the TRIAM-1 tokamak [67], in the test stand DSM-2, and similarly, of mirrors exposed in DIII-D and TEXTOR in the toroidal stand TOMAS [68]. A high efficiency of chemical cleaning of hydrocarbon films was demonstrated in ref [69].…”
Section: Removal Of Deposited Filmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of these films are described in refs [65,66], and [53], respectively. The effect of long term sputtering by plasma ions on the appearance of diffusive components was studied for mirrors of different materials by the use of the DSM-2 stand (in IPP NSC KIPT).…”
Section: In Situ Inspection Of In-vessel Mirror Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the location of the subvoxel has intersected the first wall then it is not added to T and the T sv of all subsequent FoV subvoxels are also neglected. This is justified since the reflectivity of the stainless steel wall is negligible for UV and x-ray wavelengths which dominate the radiation in LHD [3]. This is repeated for each channel of each IRVB giving one geometry matrix for each IRVB.…”
Section: Definition Of the Plasma Voxels And Calculation Of The Geomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon based films of up to 50 nm thickness have been found after exposure of stainless steel mirror samples in LHD. The properties are strongly depending on the location ranging from hard films mainly consisting of Fe (40 %), C (40 %), and O (10 %), which were difficult to remove in D glow discharges, to soft films mainly consisting of C (90 %) and H (10 %) [271]. The deposition strongly depends on the individual poloidal position in the torus and the temperature of the surface.…”
Section: Coatingmentioning
confidence: 99%