2010
DOI: 10.1179/174328409x433778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of current density on distribution and roughness of nanocrystallites for duplex treatment

Abstract: Up to fourth moment distribution of carbide nanocrystallites produced by duplex treatments of surface nanocrystallisation and pulsed plasma electrolytic carburising on AISI 316 stainless steel was investigated by means of figure analysis with high precision. Skewness and kurtosis study of Gaussian distribution have been studied, and the effect of current density has been determined. The usage of higher current densities is more suitable for achieving lower sizes of carbide nanocrystallites. Surface roughness o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The VGE formed around the working electrode is usually considered relatively thin (≤ 10 -3 m), providing the highest electrical resistance in the circuit [1]. Therefore, the voltage drop in the electrolyte is often neglected, and the current density at the electrolyte -VGE interface is averaged and considered constant [6,121]. While the former is fair for the majority of EPPs with a VGE, the latter holds only when using the simplest electrode shapes and layouts, e.g.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Field Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VGE formed around the working electrode is usually considered relatively thin (≤ 10 -3 m), providing the highest electrical resistance in the circuit [1]. Therefore, the voltage drop in the electrolyte is often neglected, and the current density at the electrolyte -VGE interface is averaged and considered constant [6,121]. While the former is fair for the majority of EPPs with a VGE, the latter holds only when using the simplest electrode shapes and layouts, e.g.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Field Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%