2017
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2017.1781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of combined xylanase and phytase on growth performance, apparent total tract digestibility, and carcass characteristics in growing pigs fed corn-based diets containing high-fiber coproducts1

Abstract: Phytate has been shown to be an antinutrient, and the feeding of high levels of phytase can break down phytate to improve nutrient utilization and pig performance. Dietary xylanase targets arabinoxylan breakdown, thereby improving energy utilization in pigs. However, the effects of simultaneous supplementation have not been clearly determined. Crossbred pigs ( = 45; mean initial weight, 26.4 ± 0.2 kg) were allotted to 1 of 9 treatments to evaluate the effects of both xylanase (endo-1,4-β xylanase [EC 3.2.1.8])… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
11
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
11
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from the current study are in contrast to those from the study of Kiarie et al (2012) who observed increased ADG of growing pigs from 22 to 55 kg BW, but not from 55 to 90 kg BW and hence for entire study period (22–90 kg BW) due to addition of a fiber-degrading enzyme product to corn–barley-based diet that had lower DE value than the recommended value by large magnitude (293 kcal/kg). Also, the results from the current study are in contrast to those from the study of Jang et al (2017) who did not observe an increased ADG of growing pigs from 26 to 122 kg BW due to addition of fiber-degrading enzyme product to corn-based diet that had lower ME value than the recommended value by large magnitude (103 kcal/kg). However, the enzyme product used in the current study contained xylanase, β-glucanase, arabinofuranosidase, and phytase activities; whereas the enzyme product used in the studies of Kiarie et al, (2012) and Jang et al (2017) contained only xylanase and β-glucanase activities, and xylanase activity, respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results from the current study are in contrast to those from the study of Kiarie et al (2012) who observed increased ADG of growing pigs from 22 to 55 kg BW, but not from 55 to 90 kg BW and hence for entire study period (22–90 kg BW) due to addition of a fiber-degrading enzyme product to corn–barley-based diet that had lower DE value than the recommended value by large magnitude (293 kcal/kg). Also, the results from the current study are in contrast to those from the study of Jang et al (2017) who did not observe an increased ADG of growing pigs from 26 to 122 kg BW due to addition of fiber-degrading enzyme product to corn-based diet that had lower ME value than the recommended value by large magnitude (103 kcal/kg). However, the enzyme product used in the current study contained xylanase, β-glucanase, arabinofuranosidase, and phytase activities; whereas the enzyme product used in the studies of Kiarie et al, (2012) and Jang et al (2017) contained only xylanase and β-glucanase activities, and xylanase activity, respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the results from the current study are in contrast to those from the study of Jang et al (2017) who did not observe an increased ADG of growing pigs from 26 to 122 kg BW due to addition of fiber-degrading enzyme product to corn-based diet that had lower ME value than the recommended value by large magnitude (103 kcal/kg). However, the enzyme product used in the current study contained xylanase, β-glucanase, arabinofuranosidase, and phytase activities; whereas the enzyme product used in the studies of Kiarie et al, (2012) and Jang et al (2017) contained only xylanase and β-glucanase activities, and xylanase activity, respectively. Thus, the differences between the current study and that of Kiarie et al (2012) and Jang et al (2017) with regard to the effects of supplemental multienzyme on growth performance of pigs could be attributed to differences in enzyme activities of the multienzyme products.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been suggested that phytate decreases fat digestibility, and that phytase should mitigate this effect (Camden et al, 2001;Selle et al, 2003;Vigors et al, 2014). The present results agree with this theory, as does research reported by Jang et al (2017). Although data from Almeida et al (2013) suggest phytase only improves N and GE digestibility when P-deficient diets are used, the current data suggest that phytase can improve digestibility of N and GE in P-adequate diets as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…All diets contained 500 phytase units ( FTU ) per kg diet and 0.15% standardized total tract digestible ( STTD ) P was assumed to be released by the phytase according to the manufacture’s recommendation. The results showed that neither X nor EB impacted ADFI and G:F over 28-d period, which was in agreement with Olukosi et al (2007) , Jang et al (2017) , and Tsai et al (2017) . The addition of EB had no impact ADG during day 0 to 7 and a tendency to improve ADG during day 8 to 14, and significantly increased ADG during day 15 to 21 and over the 28-d trial, indicating EB-supplemented diets need to be fed for at least 3 wk to show positive effects on growth rate in nusery pigs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%