2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of calendering on paper surface micro-structure: A multi-scale analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, of these papers, was 9.6 ± 2.0 μm for Gel Blot paper, 6.4 ± 1.9 μm for Whatman #1 paper, and 3.3 ± 1.2 μm for Whatman #50 paper. The area root mean square roughness parameter, S R.M.S. , was 13.5 ± 0.7 μm for Whatman Gel Blot paper, 10.7 ± 0.6 μm for Whatman #1 paper, and 6.5 ± 0.3 μm for Whatman #50 paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…, of these papers, was 9.6 ± 2.0 μm for Gel Blot paper, 6.4 ± 1.9 μm for Whatman #1 paper, and 3.3 ± 1.2 μm for Whatman #50 paper. The area root mean square roughness parameter, S R.M.S. , was 13.5 ± 0.7 μm for Whatman Gel Blot paper, 10.7 ± 0.6 μm for Whatman #1 paper, and 6.5 ± 0.3 μm for Whatman #50 paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…From this relationship, the correlation length describes a fluent transition between nanoscale features in AFM images towards microscale features in NCP. However, these transition features are sensitive to processing of the paper and could disappear after calendering, showing a linear increase of the correlation length with sampling size [47], with minor variations only at large scales [48]. According to previous relationships for pigment coated papers [27], the correlation length enabled the identification of two critical roughness points describing the maximum roughness at the small and large scale length.…”
Section: Extrapolation Of Spatial Roughness Data Between Different Methods and Length Scalesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It builds a three-dimensional view of the surface of a sample from a stack of images. It is typically used for paper and printing topography measurements [Vernhes et al, 2009], semiconductor characterisation [Rosle et al, 2010], or in anthropology and archaeology fields [Bello et al, 2009]. It allows measurement of textures and profiles, according to ISO 25178.…”
Section: Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%