2007
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2007.910869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Buffer Layer on Single-Event Burnout of Power DMOSFETs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calibrated and predictive models developed in this study provide support for the Titus-Wheatley expression given in (1) in which the ion atomic number, as opposed to LET, is the important parameter for determining the electric field needed to rupture the oxide. Rupture occurs when the sum of the applied Vgs and the transient field generated by the epilayer response to an ion strike exceeds this critical field.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calibrated and predictive models developed in this study provide support for the Titus-Wheatley expression given in (1) in which the ion atomic number, as opposed to LET, is the important parameter for determining the electric field needed to rupture the oxide. Rupture occurs when the sum of the applied Vgs and the transient field generated by the epilayer response to an ion strike exceeds this critical field.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Two potentially catastrophic failure mechanisms create a radiation hardness assurance challenge for these devices when biased in the off-state: single-event gate rupture (SEGR) and single-event burnout (SEB). Over time, successful process-level methods for reducing SEB susceptibility have been implemented [1]- [4] elevating the profile of SEGR as a continued concern in radiation-hardened vertical power MOSFETs. In part due to the severity of SEGR consequences and in part due to the difficulty of accurate SEGR rate estimation, SEGR mitigation methodologies emphasize risk avoidance, using heavy-ion accelerator tests to define safe operating conditions for a surface-incident linear energy transfer (LET).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the additional dr the SEB tolerance [2,4]. As shown that the additional drain buffer laye tolerance at low temperature.…”
Section: Improved Stmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many studies on SEB of MOSFET by cosmic ray have been presented. Generally, the SEB failure mechanism for MOSFET is explained as follows: electron and hole pairs are generated by a cosmic ray particle, then the holes flow into source n+ as a base current of parasitic npn transistor and electrons flow into n-epi layer as a collector current of the parasitic transistor, and the electrons enhance the electric field at the n-epi / n+ substrate interface and impact ionization increases in this region [3,4]. It is also reported that the tolerance of SEB increases when the temperature increases [5,6], but few papers attempt to explain the mechanism of this dependence of SEB tolerance on temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang and Amaratunga have showed the analysis of SEB and single-event gate rupture (SEGR) in super-junction MOSFETs which can make the SEB and SEGR less sensitive [9]. It has also been found that the Manuscript addition of a buffer layer can improve the device's SEB threshold voltage, thus, improve the device's SEB performance [10]. Many researchers have attempted to discuss the SEB characterization in power MOSFETs with a buffer layer [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%