2014
DOI: 10.1364/ome.4.001997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of boundary on refractive index of PDMS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen from the graphs in figures 2(a) and (b), the minimum temperature limits at which transmission at 1560 nm wavelength becomes less than 1% are different for samples #1 and #2 and amount to -18.5 °C and 0 °C, respectively. The polymer we used has the property of increasing the refractive index at the polymer/fiber interface [28]. Since the entire mass of the thin film is concentrated at this boundary, in contrast to the powder, scattered over the polymer volume, the change in transmission with decreasing temperature will be faster for sample #2 (figure 2(c)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen from the graphs in figures 2(a) and (b), the minimum temperature limits at which transmission at 1560 nm wavelength becomes less than 1% are different for samples #1 and #2 and amount to -18.5 °C and 0 °C, respectively. The polymer we used has the property of increasing the refractive index at the polymer/fiber interface [28]. Since the entire mass of the thin film is concentrated at this boundary, in contrast to the powder, scattered over the polymer volume, the change in transmission with decreasing temperature will be faster for sample #2 (figure 2(c)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the TiO 2 particles were acquired in powder form with a mean diameter of 1 μ m. The size distribution of these particles and how spherical they were was never established. It has also been shown that PDMS can acquire refractive index inhomogeneity at interfaces with other materials and PDMS itself (i.e., at a PDMS-PDMS interface) [ 31 ]. Whilst this could also explain a deviation in the observed scattering coefficient in the “OBEL” phantom, it may also describe the origin of the vertical line type feature running along the left hand vertical edges of the “B”, “E” and “L” letters in the experimental image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, PDMS can reduce the time and elaboration or refinement of components [16,17] for previously mentioned feature characteristic of PDMS, has been applied to the enhancement of microelectronic components, sensors, valves, detectors, filters, solid elastic lenses, and antenna substrate for microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) [18]. On the other hand, there is significant literature or on the physical and chemical properties of PDMS, which involved specific synthesis processes like curing agents molding ratio, temperature and curing times, composite materials, among others [19][20][21][22][23][24]. To enhance the PDMS's relatively low elastic modulus, we need to reinforce or filter out polymers with desired composites or ceramics, leading to more suitable characteristics, such as surface energy compatibility modulus and superior hydrophobicity [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%