2016
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(16)00124-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score on safety and efficacy of intra-arterial treatment: a subgroup analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial (MR CLEAN)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
104
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
104
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the MR CLEAN trial did not use additional imaging criteria. A subgroup analysis of MR CLEAN showed that NCCT ASPECTS 5–7 patients can be safely treated with EVT [26]. According to these results, the vast majority of the WUS patients with a proximal anterior circulation occlusion in our study (96% with ASPECTS > 5) would have been eligible for EVT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Only the MR CLEAN trial did not use additional imaging criteria. A subgroup analysis of MR CLEAN showed that NCCT ASPECTS 5–7 patients can be safely treated with EVT [26]. According to these results, the vast majority of the WUS patients with a proximal anterior circulation occlusion in our study (96% with ASPECTS > 5) would have been eligible for EVT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Desilles et al described a positive although non-significant trend towards better functional outcome (23.1% vs 9.5%), lower mortality rate (45.7% vs 57.1%), and lower rate of sICH (23.9% vs 45.5%) in successfully reperfused patients compared with non-reperfused patients from the DWI-ASPECTS 0–4 subgroup 21. Nevertheless, given these patients’ overall poor prognosis, any absolute benefit with current treatment would be likely to be minimal 23. Therefore, ASPECTS ≤4 may offer a viable exclusion criterion in the selection of patients for EVT to prevent futile or even harmful recanalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent subgroup analysis of MR CLEAN suggested that patients with ASPECTS 5-7 should be treated with intra-arterial therapy [11]. Compared to patients with ASPECTS 8-10, slightly fewer ASPECTS 5-7 patients had good functional outcomes, while an equivalent number demonstrated moderate functional outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many of these landmark trials an ASPECTS ≥6 was required for inclusion, and as a result the American Heart Association guidelines that soon followed the release of these studies adopted this criterion [10]. While this criterion helped contribute to the large treatment effect sizes of the trials, it opens up questions about why not all patients with favorable ASPECTS do well in spite of rapid reperfusion, and whether patients with lower ASPECTS may still benefit from therapy [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%