2018
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of ASPECTS and endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis

Abstract: BackgroundPrompt revascularization of the ischemic penumbra following an acute ischemic event (AIS) has established benefit within the literature. However, use of the semi-quantitative Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) to evaluate patient suitability for revascularization has been inconsistent in patient risk stratification and selection.ObjectiveTo conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the available evidence for a clinically valid ASPECTS threshold in assessment of suitability for revascularizatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(18 reference statements)
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expectedly, our results are in line with previous studies [ 3 , 4 , 7 , 19 - 21 ] demonstrating the direct correlation between larger infarct core sizes decreased odds of favorable functional outcome. In our sample as a whole, for every 10 mL increase in core volume, there was a 22% increase in the risk of unfavorable outcome, and a 26% increase in the risk of 90 days functional dependence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Expectedly, our results are in line with previous studies [ 3 , 4 , 7 , 19 - 21 ] demonstrating the direct correlation between larger infarct core sizes decreased odds of favorable functional outcome. In our sample as a whole, for every 10 mL increase in core volume, there was a 22% increase in the risk of unfavorable outcome, and a 26% increase in the risk of 90 days functional dependence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A previous meta-analysis tackling the effect of ASPECTS on the outcomes of EVT patients suggested futility of the intervention for patients with low ASPECTS. 29 What our study reveals is that despite the relatively lower good (mRS of 0-2) 90-day outcomes (27.7%) compared to the earlier trials (46.0%) 13 utilizing criteria that screened out large core infarct patients, there is still benefit compared to low ASPECTS patients only receiving best medical therapy who have a dismal 3.7% rate of good outcomes at 90 days.…”
Section: Summary Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 56%
“…However, nonrandomized studies and meta-analyses evaluating the clinical benefit of MT in patients with low ASPECTS have mixed results, with some studies demonstrating improvement after MT even in patients with incomplete or failed recanalization, while others suggest MT is not beneficial in patients with low ASPECTS. 13 , 22 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%