1995
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4488(94)00033-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of amount offered on intake, digestibility and value of Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala for West African Dwarf goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The significantly lower intake in the G. sepium supplementation compared to that of M. oleifera could be due to palatability problem encountered by small ruminants when fed with G. sepium (25). The higher VFI in M. oleifera and G. sepium fodder combination supplement than the single supplement of M. oleifera and G. sepium is in line with the reports of other authors who asserted that there were better production outcomes in browse mixtures than single browses (9,26). This could be as a result of improved palatability due to the combination of the two fodders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The significantly lower intake in the G. sepium supplementation compared to that of M. oleifera could be due to palatability problem encountered by small ruminants when fed with G. sepium (25). The higher VFI in M. oleifera and G. sepium fodder combination supplement than the single supplement of M. oleifera and G. sepium is in line with the reports of other authors who asserted that there were better production outcomes in browse mixtures than single browses (9,26). This could be as a result of improved palatability due to the combination of the two fodders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…High responses of these mixtures have been reported for small ruminants. For example, Bosman et al fed West African Dwarf (WAD) goats with gliricidia and leucaena as mixture (9). Weight gain with gliricidia alone was 2g/W -0.75 /day and for the mixture a weight gain of 8.2g/W -0.75 /day was obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this experiment, the amount of refusal of straw and enset leaf was high almost about 50% at higher offer rate. Bosman et al (1995) suggested that if the feed is heterogeneous and thus offers opportunity for selection, high offer levels and accompanying high refusal rates may have to be accepted if the objective is to maximize animal production per unit of available feed. Wahed et al (1990) demonstrated that increasing the amount of barley straw by allowing higher refusal rates (above 50%) than the conventional 10-20% refusal rate enhanced voluntary intake in sheep and goats.…”
Section: Feed Intake and Weight Gainmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A determinação do nível de oferta que resulte em maior eficiência de utilização da palha foi feita utilizando-se a equação descrita por BOSMAN et al (1995):…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Entretanto, seria arriscado descartar técnicas como a amonização, uma vez que o efeito de níveis de oferta não tem sido estudado com palhas tratadas. Outro aspecto importante a ser considerado é que, para caracterizar o valor nutritivo da palha amonizada, necessita-se de informações sobre o consumo potencial máximo, a digestibilidade da matéria seca (MS) e o balanço de nitrogênio em condições nas quais é permitido ao animal ampla oportunidade para selecionar o alimento (BOSMAN et al, 1995). BOSMAN et al (1995) sugerem que uma forma de medir o valor do alimento para produção animal é determinar a quantidade máxima de nutrientes digestíveis acima das exigências de mantença, que o animal ingeriria por unidade de alimento ofertado.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified