2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of enset (Ensete ventricosum) leaf supplementation on feed intake, digestibility, nitrogen utilization and body weight gain of sheep fed untreated or urea and calcium oxide-treated wheat straw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The improvement in CP content by chemical treatment of wheat straw in the present study is similar to an increase of 37.5% (26 vs. 42 g/kg DM) reported by Nurfeta et al (2009) but lower than that of Sharma et al (2004) who recorded more than a twofold increase (39 vs. 85 g/kg DM). Probable reasons for these variations include differences in treatment conditions and the initial straw quality.…”
Section: Feed Intake Yield Of Carcasses and Non-carcass Componentssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The improvement in CP content by chemical treatment of wheat straw in the present study is similar to an increase of 37.5% (26 vs. 42 g/kg DM) reported by Nurfeta et al (2009) but lower than that of Sharma et al (2004) who recorded more than a twofold increase (39 vs. 85 g/kg DM). Probable reasons for these variations include differences in treatment conditions and the initial straw quality.…”
Section: Feed Intake Yield Of Carcasses and Non-carcass Componentssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Various techniques to improve utilisation of low-quality forages have been tested but the techniques have to a large extent not been adopted by farmers in tropical countries for various reasons including economic constraints (Ben Salem and Smith 2008). However, earlier studies (Trach 2000) reported that a combination of urea (CO (NH 2 ) 2 ) and lime (CaO/Ca (OH) 2 ) for chemical treatment of straw is more economically feasible although the effects of forage alkali treatments on animal performance are often variable due to the variation in the type/genotype of crop used and treatment conditions (Nurfeta et al 2009). In addition, the efficiency at which low-quality roughages are digested depends on species of the animal (Li et al 2008) and breed of animal within species (Habib et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of authors have analyzed the role of enset as animal feed (Fekadu & Ledin, ; Gizachew, Hirpha, Jalata, & Smit, ; Nurfeta, Eik, et al, ; Nurfeta, Tolera, et al, ; Nurfeta, Tolera, Eik, & Sundstøl, ) (see Figure ). Mohammed, Martin, and Laila () identified the leaf as a good source of animal fodder, containing 13% protein, 20% crude fiber and 10% sugar.…”
Section: Processing Methods Products and Cultural Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the calorie content of kocho per 100 g of edible material is reported 200 kcal or 57% lower than the corresponding value for 100 g of food grains (Urga, Fite, & Biratu, ). Other studies have investigated the nutritional value of the resulting enset food products (Atlabachew & Chandravanshi, ; Forsido, Rupasinghe, & Astatkie, ) or as a component of animal feeds (Afele, ; Nurfeta et al, ; Talore, ). Only one recent paper by Bosha et al () included an assessment of the nutritional content of wild enset individuals in comparison with domestic varieties.…”
Section: Processing Methods Products and Cultural Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation