2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2007.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of AlN buffer thickness on stress relaxation in GaN layer on Si (111)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in agreement with our result. This phenomenon (the so-called strong stress effect) was observed in our previous study [7]. By integrating our results, it is considered that a strong stress effect appeared above 100 cm À 1 crack density.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is in agreement with our result. This phenomenon (the so-called strong stress effect) was observed in our previous study [7]. By integrating our results, it is considered that a strong stress effect appeared above 100 cm À 1 crack density.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is considered that the abovementioned strong stress effect makes helplessly the tradeoff. The behavior of crack density and (0 0 2) FWHM in the case of the 100-nm thickness is similar to that of the sample without the LT-AlN interlayer in our previous result, which does not show a tradeoff [7]. However, there is a big difference in the stress relaxation and crack density between the 100-nm-thick sample and the sample without the LT-AlN interlayer.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although GaN-based devices have been produced, the growth mechanism of GaN on Si substrate still needs to be researched. Recently, the Al pre-deposition before growing the AlN buffer layer was mentioned by some teams [14][15][16][17]. Liu et al [18] reported that the substrate was exposed to trimethylaluminum (TMAl) for 10 s in order to prevent the formation of a Si x N y layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The root-mean square (RMS) roughness values for the samples were notably different; sample A showed a relatively rough (4.6 nm) surface, but sample B showed a smooth surface (1.0 nm). The lattice defects are known to have a strong relationship with surface morphology and with the strain of the film [20]. Hence, the results shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%