Efeito do porta-enxerto e da época de poda na duração das fases fenológicas e no acúmulo de graus-dia pela videira 'Niagara Rosada'

Tecchio, Marco António; Moura, Mara Fernandes; Paioli-Pires, Erasmo José; Terra, Maurilo Monteiro

doi:10.1590/s0100-29452013000400019

Cited by 15 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Research has already been done on the effect of the rootstock on dates and length of the grapevine phenology stages in other conditions, such as different soils, climates, cultural practices and genetic materials (SATO et al, 2008;TECCHIO et al, 2011TECCHIO et al, , 2013LOUREIRO et al, 2016). Other aspects of phenology were also studied as well as the effect of the pruning time (MURAKAMI et al, 2002;BRIGHENTI et al, 2015), maturity and harvest of the grapes out of season (SATO et al, 2008) and at two grape harvests per year (ANZANELLO et al, 2012).…”

Section: Dates Of Phenology Stages Number Of Days Between Each Stagementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other studies on GDD were carried out in different places, grapevine varieties or cultural practices (ROBERTO et al, 2004;NEISS et al, 2010;ANZANELLO et al, 2012;TECCHIO et al, 2013;BRIGHENTI et al, 2015;NUNES et al, 2016;CARVALHO, 2016). There are differences between the results of these trials and those of the present study, which are mainly due to terroir, cultural practices and genetic material used in the experiments.…”

Section: Heat Requirement To Ripen the Grapementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the cultural practices which have an effect on the grapevine phenology stages, the pruning time is mentioned (MURAKAMI et al, 2002;TECCHIO et al, 2013;GATTI et al, 2016;PETRIE et al, 2017), winter and summer pruning (ANZANELLO et al, 2012), canopy management (TROUGHT et al, 2011), irrigation (VERDUGO-VÁSQUEZ et al, 2016 and growth in greenhouse (SCHIEDECK et al, 1997). The effect of rootstock on the vine phenology is reported for the heat requirement of Vitis labrusca (SATO et al, 2008;TECCHIO et al, 2011) and Vitis vinifera varieties (ALLEBRANDT et al, 2015), including table grape (BENJAMIN et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Rootstock-scion interaction:6. Phenology, chilling and heat requirements of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine

Miele

2019

Rev. Bras. Frutic.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The grapevine phenology is dependent on several factors, such as genetics, soil characteristics, climate conditions, pests and diseases and vineyard cultural practices. Among these, grafting may have an effect on the scion behavior due to the influence of the rootstock. Therefore, an experiment was carried out for two years to determine the effect of rootstocks on Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) grapevine phenology, chilling and heat requirements. Treatments consisted of vines grafted on the rootstocks Rupestris du Lot, 101-14 Mgt, 3309 C, 420A Mgt, 5BB K, 161-49 C, SO4, Solferino, 1103 P, 99 R, 110 R, Gravesac, Fercal, Dogridge and Isabel. Budbreak and flowering of the vines, veraison and maturity of the grapes were the phenological stages evaluated, determining the dates of each stage and the number of days between them. The chilling hours (Tbase= 10 °C) for budbreak and the heat summation required to ripen the grapes were also determined. The results showed that the dates of each phenological stage varied according to the year and the rootstock. The average of two years showed that CS/3309 C, CS/161-49 C and CS/101-14 Mgt sprouted earlier and CS/Dogridge later. Grape maturity was earlier on seven CS/rootstocks, where CS/101-14 Mgt and CS/Rupestris du Lot ripened first and CS/Isabel, CS/5BB K and CS/SO4 later. The average intervals between the stages of CS/rootstocks were (in days), 46.8±3.0 (budbreak-flowering), 64.3±2.1 (flowering-veraison), 54.6±6.1 (veraison-maturity) and 165.7±7.4 (budbreak-maturity). In 1998, 615.9±8.0 chill hours were needed to achieve 50% budbreak and in 1999, 870.6±6.5 chill hours, where CS/Dogridge required the highest chilling to break dormancy. In order to ripen the grapes, the heat requirement from budbreak to maturity was 1573.4±43.0 °C in 1998/1999 and 1599.4±25.5 °C in 1999/2000, and the juice total soluble solids values were 19.1 and 18.1 °Brix, respectively. Although the heat summation of the second cycle was 1.65% higher, the total soluble solids were lower due to the rainfall that was much higher during its grape ripening period.

show abstract

Section: Dates Of Phenology Stages Number Of Days Between Each Stagementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Heat Requirement To Ripen the Grapementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Rootstock-scion interaction:6. Phenology, chilling and heat requirements of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine

Miele

2019

Rev. Bras. Frutic.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although, rootstock is known for its vigor, several studies have shown that rootstocks differ in their effect on water and nutrient absorption capacity in the grafted variety, since there is selectivity in ion movement in soil and root absorption, according to each variety (Tecchio et al, 2011). Each rootstocks may interact differently with grape vine's fruits phenology, degree-day accumulation, yield, quality (Motta et al, 2009;Rizk-Alla et al, 2011;Jogaiah et al, 2013;Tecchio et al, 2013;Tofanelli et al, 2011); plants physiology (Cookson and Ollat, 2013); soaked and saline soils tolerance (Jogaiah et al, 2014); plant resistance to drought (Serra et al, 2014); and disease resistance (Billones-Baaijen et al, 2014, Murolo andRomanazzi, 2014). Besides the combination of rootstocks and canopy conductance can affect water and nutrient uptake in grape vines (Bavaresco and Lovisolo, 2000).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nutrient uptake in ‘Venus’ grape vine grafted onto different rootstocks during two growing seasons

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current study aimed to assess the influence of the 'IAC 766', 'IAC 572',' rootstocks on nutrient uptake of 'Venus' grape vine by pruning branches and harvesting clusters during two consecutive grape growing seasons. The experiment was conducted in Votuporanga, state of Sao Paulo. Treatments consisted of the variety 'Venus' grafted onto four rootstocks during two growing seasons (2013 and 2014). The rootstocks evaluated were 'IAC 766', 'IAC 572', 'IAC 313' and 'IAC 571-6'. We sampled the grape branches at pruning and their clusters at harvest time. The macro and micronutrient contents in both branches and clusters were analyzed. Nutrient uptake and removal were separately estimated in pruned branches and harvested clusters by uptake nutrient sum. Results indicated great nutrient uptake means in 'IAC 572' and 'IAC 766' during both seasons. Moreover, total removal uptake showed the following order K > N > Ca > P > Mg > S > Mn > Fe > Zn > B > Cu in pruned branches and harvested clusters.

show abstract

“…Essa quantidade de energia é normalmente expressa em graus-dia (GD), que é a diferença entre a temperatura média ambiente e a temperatura-base (valor abaixo do qual não ocorre desenvolvimento) (SATO et al, 2008). O conhecimento das necessidades térmicas permite que o viticultor faça um planejamento da duração do ciclo de produção e a provável data de colheita, de acordo com os dados climáticos de cada região e a demanda térmica de cada variedade (TECCHIO et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Ciclo de produção e demanda térmica de clones da videira 'Concord' sobre diferentes porta-enxertos

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O objetivo do trabalho foi determinar a duração do ciclo de produção e a necessidade térmica de seis clones de 'Concord' sobre três porta-enxertos no norte do Paraná. Foram avaliados os clones '22', '28', '49', '202', '211' e '225', obtidos pela Embrapa Uva e Vinho, e enxertados sobre os porta-enxertos 'IAC 766', 'IAC 572' e '420-A'. O trabalho foi realizado em área experimental pertencente ao Centro Tecnológico da COROL - Cooperativa Agroindustrial, localizado no município de Rolândia-PR. O experimento foi realizado em esquema fatorial (6 clones x 3 porta-enxertos), em delineamento inteiramente casualizado, com cinco repetições. As plantas foram conduzidas em sistema de latada, no espaçamento de 4,0 m x 2,0 m, e as avaliações foram realizadas nas safras de 2009/2010 e 2010/2011. Verificou-se que dentre os clones de 'Concord' avaliados, o '202' apresenta a menor duração do ciclo entre a poda e a colheita, sendo portanto o mais precoce. Dentre os porta-enxertos, o '420-A' induz a maior taxa de acúmulo diário de sólidos solúveis do mosto, proporcionando redução do ciclo total e da demanda térmica dos clones de 'Concord', enquanto o 'IAC 572' induz a menor taxa, promovendo aumento do ciclo e da demanda térmica dos clones.

show abstract

Efeito do porta-enxerto e da época de poda na duração das fases fenológicas e no acúmulo de graus-dia pela videira 'Niagara Rosada'

Cited by 15 publications

References 9 publications

Rootstock-scion interaction:6. Phenology, chilling and heat requirements of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine

Rootstock-scion interaction:6. Phenology, chilling and heat requirements of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine

Nutrient uptake in ‘Venus’ grape vine grafted onto different rootstocks during two growing seasons

Ciclo de produção e demanda térmica de clones da videira 'Concord' sobre diferentes porta-enxertos

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About