Editorial

Using the scientific method, the purpose of the article was to study financial control as one of the types of state control over the activity of public railway transport. In the results of the research, the scientific approaches to the concepts of: “control”, “state control” and “financial control” are considered. The place of the latter in the general system of control over the management of state (local) resources and its specific use is studied. In addition, the characteristics and purpose of the regulation of financial control are established. In terms of its practical significance, it is determined that state financial control is carried out by conducting financial audit activities, monitoring financial transactions, identifying violations of the use of funds, etc., activities which are carried out by special state authorities and their authorized representatives. In the conclusions, it is stated that the state financial control over public railway transport should be understood as the system of measures aimed at ensuring the effective use of funds from the state budget and other state financial resources, in order to achieve national, economic and social goals.

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Financial control as a kind of state control over the activities of public railway transport

Zaikina,

Nikitin,

Demenko

et al. 2023

“…The relevance of the study of administrative coercion as a tool for securing State defense order lies in the fact that the effective implementation of a defense order requires proper control, coordination and enforcement of duties by enterprises, organizations and citizens related to the defense sphere, especially considering the processes, threatening social existence of the society (Kharytonov et al 2021) and struggle between freedom and dependence (Panchenko et al, 2022). State defense procurement is a complex system of planning, implementation and control over the manufacture and supply of military products, weapons, equipment and services.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Administrative coercion as the method for providing state defense order

Povydysh,

Makarchuk,

Nakonechna

et al. 2023

Using the logical and semantic method the purpose of the research was to reveal the essence of administrative coercion as a method of ensuring the state defense order. In the results of the research the article defines administrative coercion as the method of ensuring the order of defense of the state in the system of legal and administrative measures to assert compliance with the duties and requirements related to the implementation of the studied institution. In terms of practical significance, it is established that administrative coercion is aimed at ensuring the smooth, efficient and operational functioning of the military-industrial complex and other important sectors providing production, supply and development of military equipment, as well as scientific research institutes and organizations engaged in the development of new technologies for defense needs. It is concluded that administrative coercion is an important and necessary method in the process of ensuring Ukraine’s security and defense capabilities, as it allows controlling the production and supply of strategically important goods and services.

Legal Aspects of the authoritarian regime in Latin America

Oleksandrovych Skrypniuk,

Vasylovych Skrypniuk,

Vasylivna Burlak

et al. 2023

The purpose of the article was to study the legal aspects of the authoritarian regime in some Latin American countries. The research methodology included the use of general and special scientific methods of knowledge, such as: dialectic, historical-legal, formal-logical, hermeneutics, generalization and comparison. It should be pointed out that the results of the research identified four Latin American countries with authoritarian regimes (El Salvador, Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela). The legal aspects of the authoritarian regime of each selected country were considered. In addition, different areas of analysis were covered and characterized in the course of the work: (government, protection of human rights, freedom of expression, legislation and prisoners’ rights). It was concluded that each of these countries has common legal aspects of authoritarianism, including the concentration of power in the hands of the president or government, control of the judiciary and legislature, within the framework of dynamics of corruption and systematic violations of human rights.