Economic value of recreational fishing in Moreton Bay and the potential impact of the marine park rezoning

Pascoe, Sean; Doshi, Amar; Dell, Q.; Tonks, Mark; Kenyon, Rob

doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.08.015

Cited by 55 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A useful valuation method to value the non‐market benefits of MPAs is the travel cost method (Brown and Mendelsohn , Pascoe et al. ), which relies on information about the costs incurred by people to visit a site. These costs are interpreted as an unobserved shadow price for site visits.…”

Section: The Non‐market Benefits Of Marine Protected Areasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimating the economic benefits and costs of highly‐protected marine protected areas

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are an increasingly popular, but debated, management strategy to conserve marine biodiversity and ensure sustainable human use of the oceans. Economic studies can contribute to the debate about MPAs as a management option by evaluating their benefits and costs to society. In this paper, we outline how to evaluate the economic benefits and costs of MPAs and provide examples from the literature to demonstrate the methods described. We review challenges and opportunities of different economic methods. One key challenge is to meaningfully compare market and non‐market benefits of MPAs—this comparison is complicated by the scarcity of studies that quantify the non‐market benefits of MPAs. Another key challenge is to quantify how the value of marine areas may change with and without MPAs. Costs are often easier to estimate than benefits, but some costs—such as maintenance and compliance costs—are rarely recognized. Analytical choices will influence the identified economic costs and benefits of MPAs. For example, the spatial extent of analyses will influence what changes in underlying ecological processes are captured and conclusions about the equitable distribution of costs and benefits across society. For these reasons, it is important that managers are aware of the challenges and opportunities described here, so that they can obtain and use the best‐quality economic information to guide decision making about MPAs.

show abstract

Section: The Non‐market Benefits Of Marine Protected Areasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimating the economic benefits and costs of highly‐protected marine protected areas

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Firstly, only visitors to the site are surveyed, so only V i > 0 are observed. Secondly, the sample presents endogenous stratification, as the probability of being sampled is affected by the number of visits made [47][48][49]. These problems can be solved using a zero-truncated distribution.…”

Section: Individual Travel Costmentioning

confidence: 99%

Economic Valuation of Cultural Heritage: Application of Travel Cost Method to the National Museum and Research Center of Altamira

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The economic assessment of non-marketed resources (i.e., cultural heritage) can be developed with stated or revealed preference methods. Travel cost method (TCM) is based on the demand theory and assumes that the demand for a recreational site is inversely related to the travel costs that a certain visitor must face to enjoy it. Its application requires data about the tourist's origin. This work aims to analyze the economic value of the National Museum and Research Center of Altamira, which was created to research, conserve, and broadcast the Cave of Altamira (UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1985). It includes an accurate replica known as the "Neocave". Two different TCM approaches have been applied to obtain the demand curve of the museum, which is a powerful tool that helps to assess past and future investments. It has also provided the annual economic value estimate of the National Museum and Research Center of Altamira, which varies between 4.75 and 8.00 million € per year.

show abstract

“…Sedangkan aspek keunggulan yang dianalisis adalah aspek lingkungan dan aspek sosial-ekonomi. Pemilihan kedua aspek ini bersesuaian dengan prinsip keberlanjutan menurut Prince et al (2015) dan Pascoe et al (2014) terkait sumberdaya ikan dan potensi ekonominya. Kriteria penilaian untuk aspek lingkungan adalah selektivitas alat tangkap, keramahan terhadap habitat ikan karang, bycatch rendah, penangkapan tidak menimbulkan polutan, keamanan bagi nelayan, perlindungan terhadap biodiversity, dan keamanan bagi ikan-ikan yang dilindungi.…”

Section: Analisis Dataunclassified

“…Hasil survai menunjukkan bahwa jumlah hasil tangkapan ikan karang yang didapat nelayan lokal rata-rata 13,61 kg/trip, padahal sebelum kegiatan pariwisata dikembangkan dalam skala industri (< tahun 2004) bisa mencapai 20 -25 kg/trip. Menurut Leroy et al (2016) dan Pascoe et al (2014), ikan karang mudah stress dan sulit berkembang biak pada kawasan yang banyak berinteraksi dengan aktivitas manusia. Aktivitas wisata seperti berenang, menyelam, dan kapal wisata dengan intensitas tinggi dapat menjadi pemicunya, sehingga jumlah hasil tangkapan ikan karang menurun.…”

Section: Penurunan Jumlah Hasil Tangkapan Ikan Karangunclassified

Degradation of Reef Fish Catch as an Effect of Tourism Industry Activities in Gili Sulat and Gili Lawang Waters, East Lombok

Mustaruddin

Savalas

Saptoriantoro

2017

J. Ilmu dan Teknologi Kelautan Tropis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of tourism activities in industrial scale since 2004 in the region of Gili Sulat and Gili Lawang have caused problem to local fishermen for catching reef fish. The objective of this research was to analyse the preeminent fishing gears of reef fish, the contamination types of tourism industries to fishing ground, and the degradation pattern of reef fish catch as an effect of tourism industry activities. The method used in this research was scoring method, quality standard test of water to fishery activities, and exponential regression model. The results showed that preeminent fishing gears of reef fish in the region of Gili Sulat and Gili Lawang were handline (Fgab = 2.000) and fish trap (Fgab = 1.556). The contamination types of tourism industries which bothering fishing ground of reef fish were total suspended solid (TSS), garbage, detergent, and timbal (Pb). The degradation pattern in quantity of reef fish catch (Y1) by activities of tourism industry (X) was formulated with moel Y1 = 31.574e-0.305X (R2=0.403, p=0.000). The degradation pattern of reef fish catch by activities of tourism industry (X) in the form of value of reef fish catch (Y2) and figuring waste in reef fishing (Y3) was formulated with model Y2=474823e-0.236X (R2=0.206, p=0.012), and Y3=1.296e0.329X (R2=0.071, p=0.156).

show abstract

Economic value of recreational fishing in Moreton Bay and the potential impact of the marine park rezoning

Cited by 55 publications

References 53 publications

Estimating the economic benefits and costs of highly‐protected marine protected areas

Estimating the economic benefits and costs of highly‐protected marine protected areas

Economic Valuation of Cultural Heritage: Application of Travel Cost Method to the National Museum and Research Center of Altamira

Degradation of Reef Fish Catch as an Effect of Tourism Industry Activities in Gili Sulat and Gili Lawang Waters, East Lombok

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About