Economic impact of transportation infrastructure investment under the Belt and Road Initiative

Abstract

China launched an ambitious strategy known as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2013 with an objective to promote regional economic growth and integration. The initiative was implemented primarily through massive investment in transportation infrastructure development among the Belt and Road countries to improve transportation connectivity and reduce trade costs. While such a strategy has been implemented for more than seven years, it remains unclear to what extent the investment of transportation infrastructure has affected the regional economic performance in various countries. To clarify this question, this study provides an in-depth assessment of BRI investment in transportation infrastructure using a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. Different from previous studies, the regional economic impact was evaluated through CGE simulations based on the actual investment data obtained from various sources. In addition, both the change of intraregional and interregional trade costs as a result of BRI transportation infrastructure investment was estimated. The results show that the transportation infrastructure investment in BRI has generated different impacts among regions. In particular, China, Central and West Asian countries have gained significant growth in GDP, employment, and economic welfare, whereas the economic impact of transportation infrastructure investment in the Central and West Europe is relatively minor. Overall, the research findings provide important policy implications for future transportation infrastructure investment in BRI countries and beyond.

The Impact of Trade Policies on Promoting Growth in Developing Countries

“…Moreover, Zhang et al [19] highlight that investment in roadways, railways, telecommunication, and technology infrastructure helps more road network to be built in OBOR participant countries and enhance transportation of manufactured goods to more markets, hence improving trade. Besides, Chen and Li [20] again prove this positive relationship that infrastructure investment improves productivity, facilitates the formation of new firms, and reduces transportation costs, which combines enhances industrial agglomeration. This then increases the total demand and output expansion of nations along the OBOR trading route, which simultaneously increases the demand factor of GDP, promoting the overall economic growth of these aid receiving nations.…”

Infrastructure in the Framework of Production Functions: Evidence of Eu Member States at the Regional Level

“…Lenz, Skender, and Mirković (2018) found that in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) MS road network development has a significant positive effect on GDP, but railways have a negative effect. Chen and Li (2021) conclude that the economic impact of transport infrastructure investments in the West and Central Europe is relatively minor. Toader, Firtescu, Roman, and Anton (2018) assessed the EU-28 MS ICT infrastructure impact on GDP per capita and found a significant positive effect.…”

The economic impacts of Russia–Ukraine War export disruptions of grain commodities

“…There are a number of methods used by CGE modelers to analyze the economic impacts of commodity trade disruptions. These include the phantom tax, direct commodity output constraints, constraining flow variables through adjustment of tariff variables, productivity shocks, willingness to pay shock and margin shocks (Chen & Li, 2021; Walmsley & Strutt, 2021). We chose the Phantom Tax approach with closure rules that fix capital endowment of the economic disruptions from the War (a type of “medium‐run approach” applicable to simulations that cover only a couple of years).…”